attached samba.spec for samba 2.2.7 from redhat-7.3
But I have also built samba on redhat 8 with a similar spec file
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 20:12, Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi Gordon,
Did you build from srpms? what version of
samba, 2.2.5 or 2.2.7? I can use any type
of authenicatoin under my
Thanks for the spec file. Now I can at least see where things went
wrong for me.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ya, sounds reasonable... but I'm building from source
rpms and I'm only starting to learn how this all works,
slowly... and I don't know exactly how to inject includes
into configure via rpmbuild.. I spose it goes somewhere
in the spec file, I'll have to try and locate that today,
and do it the
in what sense do you mean require? require that it is
installed perhaps? you certainly don't have to use
ldap just because samba has support for it. You can
use what ever other athentication methods are built in...
and the overhead of just installing ldap client isn't
all that big...
Cheers
Bill Dossett wrote:
in what sense do you mean require? require that it is
installed perhaps? you certainly don't have to use
ldap just because samba has support for it.
I mean that yesterday I installed an LDAP enabled Samba package that I'd
built on a Red Hat Linux machine, and it promptly
Bill Dossett wrote:
ya, sounds reasonable... but I'm building from source
rpms and I'm only starting to learn how this all works,
slowly... and I don't know exactly how to inject includes
into configure via rpmbuild.. I spose it goes somewhere
in the spec file
Yeah... put it at the beginning of
Hi Gordon,
Did you build from srpms? what version of
samba, 2.2.5 or 2.2.7? I can use any type
of authenicatoin under my 2.2.5 that I built,
but I am getting continued weirdness from 2.2.7...
I've set the smbpasswd -w secret yet it's failing
to get it and failing to authenticate via the ldap
Schaefer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bill Dossett
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rh9 samba + ldap NOT THERE
Hi,
If you're considering using samba, ldap and
Redhat 9, forget it. Spent all day
Been following the thread somewhat. I grabbed a set of rpms from
freshrpms.net in the test area. These worked for me, but they don't
have ssl. I never could get an rpm to build using the samba.spec under
RH9. It kept failing. If somebody got it to compile (especially with
ssl) could you
Hi,
If you're considering using samba, ldap and
Redhat 9, forget it. Spent all day yesterday
trying to get RH9 samba srpm to compile with it and
no go... I was under the impression that a lot
of people use ldap to authenticate samba users
for central authentication, at least I do...
they are
Bill Dossett wrote:
Don't really see why Redhat don't build samba
with ldap support built in... it's hardly experimental
any more...
Probably because if you do so, then samba *requires* LDAP. This
introduces a massive overhead in the initial setup of Samba.
I use samba and LDAP myself, but I
Ok... i don't give up that easily and after a lot
of poking around, I found the answer to this...
In order to compile samba from SRPM to work with ldap,
you need to make the end of the --with section of the samba.spec
file look like this:
--with-profile \
--disable-static \
Bill Dossett wrote:
...
and then ... you need to fix some paths in the ssl headers...
kerberos headers aren't found first... as they are in
/usr/kerberos/include
symlink all the dirs and files there to
/usr/include
...
Took me a day and a half to figure that out,
hopefully it might save someone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bill Dossett
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rh9 samba + ldap NOT THERE
Hi,
If you're considering using samba, ldap and
Redhat 9, forget it. Spent all day yesterday
14 matches
Mail list logo
