Re: Consistency tests

-7110) as well as in the consistency tests paper (Fushman et al., 1998, JACS, 120: 10947-10952), eta is only described as the cross-correlation rate between 15N CSA and 15N-1H dipolar interaction. Cheers Séb :) Sébastien Morin wrote: Hi

Re: Consistency tests

Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, For the eta value calculated in the consistency_tests code, I don't know if it is the eta_z or eta_xy value. In the original paper by Fushman Cowburn (1998, JACS, 120: 7109-7110) as well as in the consistency tests paper (Fushman et al., 1998, JACS

Re: Consistency tests

calculated in the consistency_tests code, I don't know if it is the eta_z or eta_xy value. In the original paper by Fushman Cowburn (1998, JACS, 120: 7109-7110) as well as in the consistency tests paper (Fushman et al., 1998, JACS, 120: 10947-10952), eta is only described

Re: Consistency tests

as in the consistency tests paper (Fushman et al., 1998, JACS, 120: 10947-10952), eta is only described as the cross-correlation rate between 15N CSA and 15N-1H dipolar interaction. Cheers Séb :) Sébastien Morin wrote: Hi Ed, Here

Re: Consistency tests

that there are different patches for different types of fixes. For example there are docstring and comment changes which could be grouped together into a single patch. Then there are modifications to the test suite for the consistency tests which should be separate. In 'specific_fns

Re: Consistency tests

Cowburn (1998, JACS, 120: 7109-7110) as well as in the consistency tests paper (Fushman et al., 1998, JACS, 120: 10947-10952), eta is only described as the cross-correlation rate between 15N CSA and 15N-1H dipolar interaction. Cheers Séb :) Sébastien Morin wrote: Hi Ed, Here

Re: Consistency tests

for different types of fixes. For example there are docstring and comment changes which could be grouped together into a single patch. Then there are modifications to the test suite for the consistency tests which should be separate. In 'specific_fns/consistency_tests.py' there is a change

Re: Consistency tests

there are docstring and comment changes which could be grouped together into a single patch. Then there are modifications to the test suite for the consistency tests which should be separate. In 'specific_fns/consistency_tests.py' there is a change to the default value of the CSA and a number of other fundamental

Re: Consistency tests

Hi, Here is a patch for the consistency tests branch of the 1.2 line (r3340). Some comments and docstrings were added as well as errors corrected from the adaptation of this code from the jw_mapping code... The following file are modified : prompt/consistency_tests.py maths_fns

Re: Consistency tests

. Cheers, Edward On 6/26/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I started working on implementing the consistency tests last week before the last post was made and, hence, I worked on repository line 1.2 (revision 3303). I implemented the consistency tests as a new type of run ('ct

Re: Consistency tests

, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I started working on implementing the consistency tests last week before the last post was made and, hence, I worked on repository line 1.2 (revision 3303). I implemented the consistency tests as a new type of run ('ct') similar to the one

Re: Consistency tests

Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I leave the original author from which I copied the code and then modified it or do I had my name to the code headers..? Thanks

Re: Consistency tests

various aspects specific to consistency tests. self.relax = relax # Results reading test. if test_name == 'set': - + # The name of the test. self.name = The user function value.set() @@ -40,36 +40,36 @@ # Spectral density

Re: Consistency tests

/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I leave the original author from which I

Re: Consistency tests

original posts will allow the patches to be more easily tracked in the mailing list https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2

Re: Consistency tests

in the mailing list https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights

Re: Consistency tests

easily tracked in the mailing list https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How

Re: Consistency tests

/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I

Re: Consistency tests

will allow the patches to be more easily tracked in the mailing list https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code

Re: Consistency tests

, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I leave the original author from which

Re: Consistency tests

to be more easily tracked in the mailing list https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/. Cheers, Edward On 7/9/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code

Re: Consistency tests

the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I leave the original author from which I copied the code and then modified it or do I had my name to the code headers

Re: Consistency tests

: Hi ! I'm about to create the patches to merge the consistency tests code into the 1.2 branch. However, I have one question. How do I treat the copyrights ? Do I leave the original author from which I copied the code and then modified it or do I had my name

Re: Consistency tests

future relax versions. Thank you for this great effort. Cheers, Edward On 6/26/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I started working on implementing the consistency tests last week before the last post was made and, hence, I worked on repository line 1.2 (revision 3303). I

Re: Consistency tests

it will need to be added to the 1.3 line for it to exist within future relax versions. Thank you for this great effort. Cheers, Edward On 6/26/07, Sebastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I started working on implementing the consistency tests last week before the last post was made

Re: Consistency tests

Hi, I started working on implementing the consistency tests last week before the last post was made and, hence, I worked on repository line 1.2 (revision 3303). I implemented the consistency tests as a new type of run ('ct') similar to the one for Jw mapping. The calculations are made for J(0

Re: Consistency tests

and found some interesting consistency tests in a paper by Fushman (Fushman et al., JACS, 1998, 120:10947-10952). This paper present 2 consistency tests to compare datasets from different magnetic fields / samples / time / etc. I think it would be interesting to implement those simple tests