Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Mahdi, Sam
I just uploaded the 4.0.2 relax -i info. I already have minfx 1.0.12 with 4.0.2. But I can't open relax on multi processor platform for either version. On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Troels Emtekær Linnet < tlin...@nmr-relax.com> wrote: > Please upgrade! > > Name Installed

Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Troels Emtekær Linnet
Please upgrade! Name InstalledVersion Current version minfx True 1.0.41.0.12 relax information: Version: 2.2.5 4.0.2 2016-09-19 19:41 GMT+02:00 Mahdi, Sam : >

Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Troels Emtekær Linnet
Hi Sam. Regarding protein 2. Try to make a spin_loop after loading the data or use the GUI: http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/Tutorial_for_model-free_analysis_sam_mahdi#Check_the_spin_containers_via_GUI Carefully check the spins. Or deselect all spins, and select 1-2 spins, and run the calculation. Add

Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Mahdi, Sam
Hi Troels, Thanks for the quick response! Protein 1: I will attempt to troubleshoot using the advice you gave me. The problem occurs write after it indicates its writing a file for prolate round_3 (so its about to start it). I will run it again and post the output to give you a better idea. I'm

Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Troels Emtekær Linnet
Hi Sam. Happy to hear you that you get some progress. Protein 1: Can you help me to find out, if you are minimizing or running Monte-Carlo simulations? This COULD be the problem: How relax works (at least how it works for relaxation dispersion): Step 1: Minimize the error for the target

Re: Using multi-processor for model_free

2016-09-19 Thread Mahdi, Sam
Hi Troels, I have successfully been able to run the model-free analysis on 64 cores. The issue appears to have been I simply did not specify the spin number, so after looking at your tutorial and making the proper modifications, it ran with no complications. The results are somewhat reasonable. I

Re: How many rounds are acceptable?

2016-09-19 Thread Johannes Dietschreit
Dear Troels, I have solved the problem. There was apparently some confusion with those who have performed the measurements. Now, that all inputs are given in the correct format and the correct nucleus is specified, relax works like a charm and the results are physically reasonable. I think