On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:43:18PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> On 3 June 2016 at 12:08, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > For the new bug report at https://gna.org/bugs/?24675, now looking at
> > the results I can see that this is actually quite a
On 3 June 2016 at 12:08, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> For the new bug report at https://gna.org/bugs/?24675, now looking at
> the results I can see that this is actually quite a deliberate
> feature. For reference, I will attach the plots for residues 133 and
>
Hi Petr,
For the new bug report at https://gna.org/bugs/?24675, now looking at
the results I can see that this is actually quite a deliberate
feature. For reference, I will attach the plots for residues 133 and
134 for the CR2 model as a PDF file to that bug report
(disp_CKIRD_133_N.pdf and
On 29 April 2016 at 11:58, Petr Padrta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:27:09AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>> On 22 April 2016 at 20:43, Petr Padrta wrote:
>> > Hi Edward,
>> >
>> > OK, I finally managed to create a bug report on gna with
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:27:09AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> On 22 April 2016 at 20:43, Petr Padrta wrote:
> > Hi Edward,
> >
> > OK, I finally managed to create a bug report on gna with attached example.
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> Thank you for that. For reference, the
Hello everybody,
I'm analysing some CPMG data with the auto-analysis script
(sample_scripts/relax_disp/cpmg_analysis.py). Problem is that I don't have the
same set of spectra for all my residues, i.e. there are missing residues in
some of the peak lists and relax doesn't like that. So far I
6 matches
Mail list logo