On 06/09/2012 11:52 PM, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
Compiled with Soprano support, using the soprano needed for nepomuk core, so
2.7.56:
Scanning dependencies of target smokesoprano
[ 5%] Building CXX object soprano/CMakeFiles/smokesoprano.dir/smokedata.o
In file included from
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
**
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 00:52:28, Andreas Pakulat va
escriure:
Ok, great, then please let the kactivities team know about this. The
release-team cannot really do anything about it (other than
Hi,
Fixed in master
rv4.8.80-17-g2102bf5
kde-runtime/plasma/declarativeimports/plasmaextracomponents/CMakeLists.txt
by Allen Winter and Christophe Giboudeaux on 10th June.
Anne-Marie
On 06/09/2012 04:11 PM, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
Another issue in the beta2 tarballs, after compiling and
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 10:32:17, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
I think it would be more efficient to send the build-problems to the
corresponding module-dev-lists immediately and assemble a list of things over
the time of a day or two and send the assembled list to the
On 06/10/2012 10:32 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.com
mailto:manutort...@gmail.com wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 00:52:28, Andreas Pakulat
va escriure:
Ok, great, then please let the kactivities
On 06/10/2012 10:05 AM, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
Hi, just for info, we have some issues with LibMusicBrainz and KDEMultimedia
1. In order to compile Tunepimp, needed for an optional feature in JUK,
LibMusicBrainz 2 is needed. This feature as been deprecated and replaced by
python-musicbrainz
2.
On 06/09/2012 11:52 PM, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
Compiled with Soprano support, using the soprano needed for nepomuk core,
so 2.7.56:
Scanning dependencies of target smokesoprano
[ 5%] Building CXX object
soprano/CMakeFiles/smokesoprano.dir/smokedata.o In file included from
On 06/10/2012 09:54 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Hi this is a forward problem we got from a packager to the Release Team.
Can you take care of it please? The Beta 2 tarballs are available to
packagers and should be out in a few days, it's quite urgent.
This was a bug in soprano. It should be
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
This can be fixed by applying the patch to soprano that restores abi/api
compatibility (the tcpclient stub, posted here on the mailinglist).
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-May/005746.html
Hey,
I just noticed that an SDO (shared desktop ontologies) fix, which we require
for the akonadi-nepomuk feeder, is not in any released version of SDO.
It's the commit :
4697389c39b7112aaf0f6ac1a36b216e78ab5e14
Fix an obvious mistake: remove cardinality restriction on nmo:messageHeader.
The
On 06/10/2012 01:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
This can be fixed by applying the patch to soprano that restores abi/api
compatibility (the tcpclient stub, posted here on the mailinglist).
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 14:24:25, Anne-Marie Mahfouf va
escriure:
So does it mean this issue is solved by using the 2.7.57?
In Soprano releases I see 2.7.56, 2.7.57, 2.7.6 as releases.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/soprano/files/Soprano/
Anne-Marie
/me puts her Quality Team hat on.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2012, 00:52:28 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Basically the same goes to all the rest of your mails, if things don't
build, the first person to speak to is the
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 14:46:05, Manuel Tortosa va escriure:
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 14:24:25, Anne-Marie Mahfouf va
escriure:
So does it mean this issue is solved by using the 2.7.57?
In Soprano releases I see 2.7.56, 2.7.57, 2.7.6 as releases.
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 19:37:08, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
Again about SDO
The akonadi-nepomuk feeder needs some commits from a SDO not yet released,
there is a 0.9.5 tagged and also a
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 00:52:28, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
**
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 19:31:51, Andreas Pakulat va
escriure:
Martin Graesslin recently had a nice blog
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 13:53:06, Wulf C. Krueger va escriure:
I see basically nothing *systematically* being done about it.
Even i don't agree they are a mess, I'll bite and ask if you have
any suggestion.
Well, they were mostly in the email I linked you to but here's
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 13:02:10, Arno Rehn va escriure:
On 06/10/2012 09:54 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Hi this is a forward problem we got from a packager to the Release Team.
Can you take care of it please? The Beta 2 tarballs are available to
packagers and should be out
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 10:39:07, Anne-Marie Mahfouf va
escriure:
Hi,
Fixed in master
rv4.8.80-17-g2102bf5
kde-runtime/plasma/declarativeimports/plasmaextracomponents/CMakeLists.txt
by Allen Winter and Christophe Giboudeaux on 10th June.
FWIW after speaking with some people
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 11:45:39, Dominik Haumann va escriure:
Hi Albert,
On Saturday, 9. June 2012 00:17:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, having the playground folder inside the kate repo is kind of
confusing since for example the plugin that was added yesterday just
Seems some odd cmake borkage is going on trying to build kdesdk-4.8.90
(4.8.80 suffered the same, but I hadn't noticed then), in that any
modules using kde4_add_plugin seem to not get compiled with -fPIC
properly, and fail linking, for example,
dolphin-plugins:
/usr/bin/ld:
On 06/10/2012 12:41 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Seems some odd cmake borkage is going on trying to build kdesdk-4.8.90
(4.8.80 suffered the same, but I hadn't noticed then), in that any
modules using kde4_add_plugin seem to not get compiled with -fPIC
properly, and fail linking, for example,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
- - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at
least once.
We do that, that's why we have a week before the release where
packagers get access to pre-release tarballs.
No, that's for us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.06.2012 20:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Feel free to wait until the packages are released publicly. That
way you'll have packages that work
[...]
There is not a single untested tarball in any semipublic site.
There are untested tarballs in a
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Wulf C. Krueger philant...@exherbo.org wrote:
No, you don't. You just told me you expect *us* to do *your* QA,
your *testing* and, ideally, sort *your* stuff out (including,
according to some, informing individual project leads).
Disrespectful.
*us* and *you*
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 20:49:51, Wulf C. Krueger va escriure:
Feel free to wait until the packages are released publicly. That
way you'll have packages that work
[...]
There is not a single untested tarball in any semipublic site.
There are untested tarballs in a
Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012, 20:17:56 schrieb Wulf C. Krueger:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
- - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at
least once.
We do that, that's why we have a week before the release
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2012, 15:27:55 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
- - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at least once.
We do that, that's why we have a week before the release where packagers
get access to pre-release tarballs.
I hope you're not too serious about that.
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 22:24:26, Andreas K. Huettel va
escriure:
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2012, 15:27:55 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
- - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at least once.
We do that, that's why we have a week before the release where packagers
On 10/06/12 15:47, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 13:02:10, Arno Rehn va escriure:
On 06/10/2012 09:54 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Hi this is a forward problem we got from a packager to the Release Team.
Can you take care of it please? The Beta 2 tarballs are
On 10/06/12 22:32, Arno Rehn wrote:
On 10/06/12 15:47, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 13:02:10, Arno Rehn va escriure:
On 06/10/2012 09:54 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Hi this is a forward problem we got from a packager to the Release
Team.
Can you take care
On 10/06/12 14:24, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
On 06/10/2012 01:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
This can be fixed by applying the patch to soprano that restores abi/api
compatibility (the tcpclient stub, posted here on the mailinglist).
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2012, 22:34:21 schrieb Arno Rehn:
Oops, seems I overlooked that. Thanks for pointing it out again, I'll
have a look.
Fixed in
http://commits.kde.org/smokegen/7b67ac626f27e1d405ab92a2d2a8bb91ffa98c2d
Excellent, thanks! Fix confirmed, and all of 4.8.90 now builds and
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
The version number seems to suggest otherwise, but 2.7.57 is more
recent
than 2.7.6.
I'm slightly confused by this remark. Would anyone have the same idea when we
release KDE 4.10 after KDE 4.9 ?
Tom Albers
KDE Sysadmin
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2012, 23:20:48 schrieb Tom Albers:
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
The version number seems to suggest otherwise, but 2.7.57 is more
recent
than 2.7.6.
I'm slightly confused by this remark. Would anyone have the same idea when
we release KDE 4.10 after KDE 4.9 ?
Since it's getting harder and harder to keep track of everything we've decided
to create a wiki page to centralize the info
http://community.kde.org/KDE/KDE_SC_4.9_beta2_release
If you find anything that is not covered, let's discuss it.
Cheers,
Albert
$ sha1sum smokegen-4.8.90.tar.xz
18c69f3ae1432176fba03c6a1d3b8fc208491a2e smokegen-4.8.90.tar.xz
Based on smokegen.git Branch master
7b67ac626f27e1d405ab92a2d2a8bb91ffa98c2d
Cheers,
Albert
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-06-2012 18:49, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
Let's put this thread to rest, though. I think we can both safely
agree we have *completely* and seemingly irreconcilable points of
view about QA and upstream/downstream roles.
Since I seem to be
+ release-team@ko
On 11 June 2012 00:55, Sebastian Dörner sebast...@sebastian-doerner.de wrote:
This has been fixed in trunk.
I also fixed one more build issue (the build failing hard in Umbrello,
when e.g. Boost is not installed). I had a look at all the recent
build system changes, and all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-06-2012 19:35, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012, 20:17:56 schrieb Wulf C. Krueger:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
- - Before announcing the tarballs,
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 20:17:56 Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
- - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at
least once.
We do that, that's why we have a week before the release where
packagers get access to pre-release tarballs.
41 matches
Mail list logo
