On Thursday, July 05, 2012 19:51:41 Michael Jansen wrote:
Will that be a normal release (i.e. full KDE SC) or just kdelibs?
This might be a nice time to try only releasing the packages that have
changes.
Please dont change that within stable series.
I fully agree with that.
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 18:07:47 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 01:00:11 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release.
Does anyone have suggestions for a release plan?
I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning
Also, *before* you start doing partial releases, please present an exact
definition of the dependencies *between versions*.
As i see that you are on the release-team list. May i ask why you voice
your objections the exact same moment someone wants to try something we
discussed here
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 12:06:12 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 18:07:47 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 01:00:11 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release.
Does anyone have suggestions for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-07-2012 17:44, Michael Jansen wrote:
If you have a problem with us setting up weekly snapshots in
that format, then you may have a point because i am thinking
about that use case. Afaik some distros provide weekly
snapshots straight from
So you guys have some artificial version 4.x.49. which
downloads sources from a branch and builds them? Artificial in not
released by kde?
What you call an artificial version is a mean for us to provide the
users who want to do it a package they can install and update whenever
they
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 04:04:42 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 18:27:42 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I think we did it for a time. At least i remember some a new
snow storm, a new snapshot commits by dirk. But no idea how
they got released/packaged.
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 22:22:38 Michael Jansen wrote:
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 04:04:42 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 18:27:42 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I think we did it for a time. At least i remember some a new
snow storm, a new snapshot commits by
Gentoo already supports betas, RCs, etc. in Portage though they have a
different nomenclature (e.g. I think 4.7.0~beta1 would be 4.7.0_beta1 in
Portage). But in order to support generic KDE snapshots that nomenclature
shouldn't change too much across future releases. As long as it's mostly
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 02:30:13 Michael Jansen wrote:
Gentoo already supports betas, RCs, etc. in Portage though they have a
different nomenclature (e.g. I think 4.7.0~beta1 would be 4.7.0_beta1 in
Portage). But in order to support generic KDE snapshots that nomenclature
shouldn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
