Hey everyone
( This is a slightly long email )
*History:*
One of the main classes in Nepomuk is called the Resource class. It's
basically just a cache of the resource data (You can imagine it to be a
hash, with properties which contain values - QHashProperty, Value).
From the early days, the
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 14.38.35 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 14:10:05 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
The sooner the better, but something for the release-team to answer. I
don't think it's that much of a problem that we absolutely have to get it
into 4.10.0, is it?
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:17:13 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 14.38.35 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 14:10:05 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
The sooner the better, but something for the release-team to answer. I
don't think it's that much of a
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote:
: remove the API in 4.11
will that work?
No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove API there. Deprecate
it would be.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:45:03 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote:
: remove the API in 4.11
will that work?
No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove API there.
Deprecate
it would be.
Ah. I thought this was
Le Tuesday 22 January 2013 10:05:07 Allen Winter a écrit :
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:45:03 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote:
: remove the API in 4.11
will that work?
No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove
This change only affects nepomuk-core.
If there are no problems, I will do the following -
* Implement these changes in master
* leave 4.10.0 alone.
* Implement these changes in KDE/4.10 in time for 4.10.1
By changes, I mean removing the automatic updates AND adding the new API.
On Tue, Jan
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 22:15:28 Vishesh Handa wrote:
This change only affects nepomuk-core.
If there are no problems, I will do the following -
* Implement these changes in master
* leave 4.10.0 alone.
* Implement these changes in KDE/4.10 in time for 4.10.1
By changes, I mean
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26006
---
Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26007
---
Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26008
---
Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26009
---
Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 7:28 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
On Jan. 22, 2013, 7:27 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective, I'd prefer
this to not go to 4.10.0, seems like something a bit fragile that might
break and we can't really afford that in 4.10.0 at the moment.
I wouldn't mind
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26018
---
From my perspective it looks OK, but I'm not putting any ship
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26016
---
From my perspective it looks OK, but I'm not putting any ship
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26019
---
From my perspective it looks OK, but I'm not putting any ship
Hi
Need someone to check when installing into /usr.
I've tested the python patch on kde 4.9.98 and installed it into /usr/lib64/
and haven't had anything go wrong... yet ;)
--- On Tue, 1/22/13, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
From: Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
Subject: Re: Review
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26029
---
Ship it!
Looks good, Thanks !
- Christophe Giboudeaux
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/#review26030
---
Ship it!
Looks good, Thanks !
- Christophe Giboudeaux
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
