Am Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2021, 15:51:50 CEST schrieb Sandro Knauß:
> Hi,
>
> in Debian we only can update Debian stable, than this needs to get approved
> by the release manages. This is done by filing a diff aganist the old
> version in stable. So providing just the patches is fine for Debian,
Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2021, 22:50:22 CEST schrieb Heiko Becker:
> On Monday, 25 October 2021 01:57:58 CEST, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > CAN WE HAVE KDE GEAR DO INDIVIDUAL AND VERSIONED HOTFIX RELEASES?
> >
> > So ideally KDE Gear has an option to do intermediate hotfix releases of
> >
> I'm unsure whether we should stick to "those are patches, grab them"
> or, for convenience, giving it a version number that is more than 5.15.2,
> less than 5.15.3, says it comes from kde, and allows multiple releases
I would suggest simply using 5.12.2-kdemmdd for those, if it will
Am 2019-09-24 00:30, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
El dijous, 19 de setembre de 2019, a les 14:49:53 CEST, Tom Albers va
escriure:
I'ld also like to add that currently some developers have access to do
releases directly - I've also seen those people putting the files on
the ftp-server for other
Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Rolf Eike Beer
wrote:
Am 2018-06-24 22:56, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Hi, would anyone be against limiting who can create
v${NUMBER}.${NUMBER}.${NUMBER}
i.e. tags that look like our release tags to members of the release
team
for
the KDE
Am 2018-06-24 22:56, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Hi, would anyone be against limiting who can create
v${NUMBER}.${NUMBER}.${NUMBER}
i.e. tags that look like our release tags to members of the release
team for
the KDE Applications git repositories?
Rationale: Some distros build from git tags so
> No commit for years -> unmaintained
> * kremotecontrol
Yes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Am Dienstag, 7. November 2017, 02:48:42 schrieb Christoph Feck:
> Hello packagers,
>
> tar.xz files for 17.08.3 are available at the usual location.
>
> REVISIONS_AND_HASHES at https://paste.kde.org/pkxt2tajz
>
>
> CI says that "kmail" is not buildable, error is:
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to
Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017, 12:30:45 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> El dimarts, 31 d’octubre de 2017, a les 9:25:45 CET, Allen Winter va
escriure:
> > On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 5:15:57 AM EDT Daniel Vrátil wrote:
> > > +1 - if it's broken and we can't afford to maintain it, we should drop
> >
> Nobody really complained so I went ahead and added
>
> https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Application_Versioning#Bugzi
> lla_versions
>
> We will start doing this for KDE Applications 17.12
That means the minimum required CMake version is now 3.0, as "project(…
VERSION)" was
> > > So, what's the general opinion on that? Nuke it immediately or for
> > > 17.12?
> >
> > I think it's too late for 17.08? (we already published
> > kremotecontrol-17.07.80.tar.xz)
>
> Correct.
Ok, what's the best time to move it then?
Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2017, 19:42:38 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
> Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto:
> > Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2017, 19:21:13 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
> >> Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto:
> >>> The last non-trivial commit was 2012 or so, it's still Qt4, the usual
> >
Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2017, 19:21:13 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
> Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto:
> > The last non-trivial commit was 2012 or so, it's still Qt4, the usual
> > game. If noone steps up I'll let it move to unmaintained so it will not
> > get released with 17.12 anymore
The last non-trivial commit was 2012 or so, it's still Qt4, the usual game. If
noone steps up I'll let it move to unmaintained so it will not get released
with 17.12 anymore. In fact, even 17.08 would be wasted.
Opinions (especially about the timeline)?
Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is
Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2016, 11:45:47 schrieb Sandro Knauß:
> Hey,
>
> Together with Andre Heinecke (developer of gpgme), we discussed the minimum
> version of GpgME we want to support with the upcoming release of KDEPIM for
> Applications 16.12.
>
> You may got the notice, that the
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016, 14:31:00 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
> Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto:
> > Git commit fe84703042f80c159cd4653d041b028385b67c81 by Rolf Eike Beer.
> > Committed on 09/10/2016 at 12:15.
> > Pushed by dakon into branch 'master'.
> >
> > Merge
Git commit fe84703042f80c159cd4653d041b028385b67c81 by Rolf Eike Beer.
Committed on 09/10/2016 at 12:15.
Pushed by dakon into branch 'master'.
Merge branch 'frameworks'
KGpg will be KF5 based from KDE Applications 16.12 on.
CCMAIL:kde-utils-de...@kde.org
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
http
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126045/#review88372
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rolf Eike Beer
On Nov. 12, 2015, 2:42
> Well, I am still using floppy disks (and KFloppy) regularly, and would be a
> bit disappointed to see it disappear. So I'd volunteer to maintain it if
> necessary.
Congrats, you have become father. Please subscribe to kde-utils-de...@kde.org.
> I would also port it to KF5, but that's probably
Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2015, 16:29:40 schrieb Michael Palimaka:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126045/#review88302
>
, but I'm fine with it.
- Rolf Eike Beer
On Nov. 12, 2015, 2:42 nachm., Heiko Becker wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 11:13:42 schrieb Andre Heinecke:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, August 30, 2015 08:04:59 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Whiting <jpwhit...@kde.org>
wrote:
> > > >
Jeremy Whiting wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Hey all,
I may have found another candidate for unmaintained. KGpg is a ui for
gnupg. I've never used it, but have used kleopatra. Anyway, here's my
reasoning. Please fix any false
Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 09:55:49 schrieb Heiko Becker:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124801/
---
Review
Vadim Zhukov wrote:
On June 12, 2013, 7:46 a.m., Vadim Zhukov wrote:
On June 12, 2013, 7:46 a.m., Vadim Zhukov wrote:
cmake/modules/FindLibRaw.cmake, line 43
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110962/diff/2/?file=149642#file149642l
ine43
So what if upstream changes:
Vadim Zhukov wrote:
cmake/modules/FindLibRaw.cmake
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110962/#comment25110
It's probably better to have own prefix for _version_* variables too,
e.g.: _libraw_version_major_match.
Pino already said that they are not indended to be used by anyone. And I
may eventually start using them. In this case they should use
the default names, which would be LibRaw_VERSION_{MAJOR,MINOR,PATCH} then.
- Rolf Eike Beer
On June 11, 2013, 5:50 p.m., Pino Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically
/r/110962/#comment25097
This if() can be removed. pkg_check_modules will simply do nothing if
PKGCONFIG_EXECUTABLE isn't found.
- Rolf Eike Beer
On June 11, 2013, 5:50 p.m., Pino Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically
be used in compile check. This
way it should be more future-compatible than parsing header file itself.
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I bet that macro is a C macro, not a CMake one. So for finding out in
CMake code which version was found this doesn't help.
Pino Toscano wrote:
Yes, I know
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013, 20:51:57 schrieb Christoph Feck:
On Thursday 17 January 2013 18:41:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Besides Jonathan's fix it also contains two other commits because
people don't respect tagging freezes.
does the packaging team also announce, when the freeze is
Am , schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Thursday 06 December 2012 16.34.21 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2012 04:22:23 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2012 13.03.37 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2012 01:31:48 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Sunday, December 02,
Am Donnerstag 06 Dezember 2012, 16:22:23 schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Monday 03 December 2012 13.03.37 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2012 01:31:48 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Sunday, December 02, 2012 16:00:33 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
A 4.9.5 is planned ?
I need to know
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012, 23:23:25 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 16:07:30 Allen Winter wrote:
Hot fixes should be sent to kde-packagers as a patch, or even better as a
commit number.
Example:
Dear packagers, we found a bad bug in kde-foo that causes
Am Montag 30 Juli 2012, 19:55:08 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
El Diumenge, 29 de juliol de 2012, a les 10:57:01, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz va
escriure:
On Saturday 28 of July 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 26 of July 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
The tarballs can be found in
Am 05.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Dirk Mueller:
Hi,
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5
release. Does
anyone have suggestions for a release plan?
I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning or in the last
July week,
as I'm on vacation in between.
Any
Hi Dirk, hi everyone,
this morning a problem was reported that would prevent KGpg from starting
up when no configuration file previously existed. This bug has been fixed
in fa0b4565a2c4aa672dc4c285d1bd445e055da626 in KDE/4.8 branch of KGpg.
Please make sure that the 4.8.0 tag includes this fix.
Hi,
I just want to notice you that 4.6.5 has a pretty annoying regression:
completion in KLineEdit inside KHTML is broken:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277457
If anyone thinks about doing a 4.6.6 it would be cool to also include the fix
for another KLineEdit inside KHTML regression
Am Dienstag 28 April 2009 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
Hi,
KDE 4.2.3 tagging is scheduled for tomorrow around 23:59 UTC. Pleasemake
sure that your fixes are included and backported to 4.2 branch until then.
If there are outstanding bugs that must be fixed before 4.2.3, please tag
them with the
38 matches
Mail list logo
