On Wednesday 03 February 2010 13:45:22 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 schrieb Rex Dieter:
(1) releases that kept software/translations bundled together makes
their packaging simpler, imo.
And it makes translation much harder and it makes adding new languages
much harder.
SVN commit 1083582 by sebas:
Release 4.4.RC3
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
A announcements/announce-4.4-rc3.php
announcements/announce-4.4-rc2.php#1083564
M +6 -0 announcements/index.php
M +5 -3 index.php
M +1 -1 info/releases.php
M +2 -0
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 12:27:55 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 26 January 2010 11:47 schreef u:
Currently, the schedule doesn't have a RC3 planned. Should I add one
inbetween? I would suggest somewhen end of this week/beginning next week,
just to ensure that we're shipping a somewhat
SVN commit 1080758 by sebas:
Release KDE 4.3.5
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
M +6 -0 announcements/index.php
M +3 -3 download/index.php
M +5 -5 index.php
M +5 -4 info/releases.php
M +2 -0 whatiskde/project.php
---
On Sunday 24 January 2010 14:39:18 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Dirk Mueller wrote:
I can confirm the compile issues with the csharp bindings, and I have no
solution yet. Indeed I'm wondering if it wouldn't be the best idea to
just release with this known defect. We've
On Monday 18 January 2010 06:58:15 John Tapsell wrote:
2010/1/18 Jonathan Riddell jridd...@ubuntu.com:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:16:35PM -0500, Vikram Dhillon wrote:
So I would like to step up and help
coordinate kdelibs, I stumbled across the release team page and saw
that kdelibs need
On Thursday 07 January 2010 14:28:22 Eric Hameleers wrote:
Here, kdelibs 4.3.90 fails to find shared-desktop-ontologies. The
I've also had this problem in a test build last week. Turned out that my cmake
was
too old, updating fixed it. Same issue?
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
On Thursday 07 January 2010 16:46:11 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Eric Hameleers wrote:
Indeed, and as Sebastian Kügler also suggested, cmake was too old,
being 2.6.2 here. With cmake 2.8.0, SDO was found alright.
My suggestion would be to force the cmake version
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 20:01:48 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Tom Albers wrote:
The schedule says RC1 is branch point, I really don't see any urgent
reason in this mail to deviate from that. If we want to we can change it
for the 4.5 schedule of course...
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 00:43:31 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 29-12-2009 18:30, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I get your point (bloat), but being vague and sarcastic is not the way to
go about it. The best is to provide numbers to back it up and show the
real costs of running two
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 13:42:11 Dror Levin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:31, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
I'm starting to get really amazed how people are willing to condemn the
use of databases without even coming up with a single performance
measurement backing up
Hey,
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 19:13:08 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Tuesday 29 of December 2009 13:50:12 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday 27 December 2009 14:34:23 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
While keeping if (NEPOMUK_FOUND) and alike CMake code is considerable
maintenance cost
On Sunday 27 December 2009 15:08:59 Allen Winter wrote:
Did devels effectively backport to make it worth a new release?
No, but of course it could be done the other way round: announce 4.3.5,
then we'll backport. Although I'd kind of hate spending time backporting
all the stuff
On Friday 18 December 2009 23:59:55 Rex Dieter wrote:
On 12/18/2009 02:24 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009, Dirk Müller wrote:
I just finished uploading the first set of Beta2 tarballs, a bit later
than expected, sorry about that.
I'll start testing
On Friday 11 December 2009 17:31:15 Burkhard Lück wrote:
* API changes
- * New strings
+ * New GUI strings
+ behavioral changes
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 30 November 2009 16:02:28 Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 09:29:58 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 15:04:05 Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 08:44:28 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Tom Albers wrote:
want
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 01:10:31 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zack Rusin wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, David Faure wrote:
Yep, seems to work now.
BUT: this code was committed at the worst possible time (*very* close
to beta1 tagging) and without review,
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:27:50 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 16:02:28 Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 09:29:58 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 15:04:05 Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 08:44:28 Dirk Mueller wrote
On Thursday 26 November 2009 13:16:05 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
We're unlikely to be able to make packages for both available by
release time, I'd prefer a delay in the beta.
A delay in release or a delay in tagging?
I assume that 4.4
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 13:26:22 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 24 November 2009 11:17 schreef u:
according to the schedule, we're planning to tag KDE 4.4 Beta1 in two
days. Does that sound reasonable to everyone? Any blocking issues?
It does mean we have tagging and releasing 4.3.4 and
Hi,
Now would be a good time to update the feature plan on techbase. It's the
document we
use to distill the feature set for the next KDE Software Compilation release,
a.k.a.
4.4
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4_Feature_Plan
We want this document to reflect the improvements and
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 18:41:36 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Wednesday 18 November 2009 18:10 schreef u:
Hi!
Colin Guthrie has been working on better integration of PulseAudio in
Phonon, but AFAIK it is now too late for getting it into 4.4, without
getting and exemption from the freeze.
On Saturday 26 September 2009 17:59:45 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Wednesday 23 September 2009 21:41 schreef u:
It is time to take a decision about Qt 4.6 KDE 4.4.0. I'ld like to
announce the following to kcd and kd next saturday.
In the past we decided that these things require two explicit
On Thursday 20 August 2009 11:46:21 David Faure wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Saturday 15 August 2009, Stephan Binner wrote:
when will tagging/release of 4.3.1 and so on happen?
Thats a good question, the regular interval would be to tag on the last
thursday
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 23:39:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dimecres, 5 d'agost de 2009, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Today KAdrresbook was replaced by KContactmanager that got then renamed
to KAdrresbook.
you probably want to
On Thursday 23 July 2009 12:26:23 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
My proposal went unoticed or ignored but I propose that for the next
release cycle we focus testers to try a beta or RC in different languages
so that i18N problems can be detected earlier than for this 4.3 release.
I propose that the
On Thursday 23 July 2009 13:42:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Jeudi, le 23 juillet 2009, à 12:51, Sebastian Kügler a écrit:
On Thursday 23 July 2009 12:26:23 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
My proposal went unoticed or ignored but I propose that for the next
release cycle we focus testers
Hi all,
Dirk added a fix for bug 200789 to the RC3 tarballs, they're now up. We'll
release shortly (i.e. tonight as soon as I'm done with work-work).
4.3.0 has been postponed to 4th August.
Cheers,
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
On Monday 06 July 2009 11:46:56 Than Ngo wrote:
Am Samstag 04 Juli 2009 18:38:56 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
we could consider shortening the period between tagging and release
(which currently effectively is 8 days). Maybe make it 4
SVN commit 993937 by sebas:
Release 4.3.0-rc2, Canteras :)
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
M +4 -2 announcements/announce-4.3-rc2.php
M +6 -0 announcements/index.php
M +3 -3 index.php
M +2 -0 whatiskde/project.php
---
On Thursday 02 July 2009 15:02:48 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 14:41:07 schrieb Ian Wadham:
I think there is a strong case for holding over Qt4.5 until KDE 4.4
and no case for dropping Kolf 1.9, which is an innocent bystander.
The problem is that we break more apps by
On Monday 29 June 2009 02:20:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
apparently not everyone packaged the exact same rc1. this is making it
really hard to sort through some of the bugs we're getting as some of the
plasma crashes should be fixed either just prior to or just after rc1
(before/after depending
I've just updated the release team's techbase page, I think the changes are
mostly trivial and just documenting what we actually do. I do want people to
look over it to make sure we're all on the same page.
I've replaced Current Activities with Activities, changing we're now in
the 4.1.3
On Friday 29 May 2009 22:51:08 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009 18:26:26 Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Can we decide now if there will be a 4.2.5 release?
If not, then that saves us some unneeded backporting work.
Recall we stopped at 4.1.4.
IMO we should stop at 4.2.4.
Hi Robby,
On Saturday 09 May 2009 22:44:51 Robby Stephenson wrote:
I just moved Tellico from KDE playgorund into kdereview. Based on
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines I wasn't sure if any i18n
or l10n files needed to be moved as well.
'move /playground/office/tellico to
On Sunday 03 May 2009 20:41:17 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Dienstag 28 April 2009 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
KDE 4.2.3 tagging is scheduled for tomorrow around 23:59 UTC. Pleasemake
sure that your fixes are included and backported to 4.2 branch until
then.
If there are outstanding bugs that
Hi,
As some of you know, I've spent some intense cycles on the social desktop
support in KDE and specifically in Plasma. This functionality integrates a
social network, in this case openDesktop.org which powers sites such as kde-
ook.org, kde-apps.org and opendesktop.org. The server-side parts
On Friday 27 March 2009 10:05:11 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:00:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Cyrille Berger wrote:
I talked with Casper (over irc) on what would be needed for releasing
oxygen icons. Unless I missed something, it's tag,
On Saturday 28 March 2009 01:27:58 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
Well my issue is another as nothing to do with the issues so far.
its about control, we are creating a new kde3.x mess couse aplications are
creating their hown versions of the same icons, and not teling any one they
do so, couse well
On Saturday 28 March 2009 02:26:26 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
A Saturday 28 March 2009 00:55:32, Sebastian Kügler escreveu:
the idea was to put every single icon there
Or is the problem the size of Oxygen? I can imagine that you don't want
to ship every single special application icon
On Thursday 05 March 2009 10:42:49 you wrote:
5 марта 2009 Sebastian Kügler написал:
KDE Community Improves Desktop with KDE 4.2.1 Codenamed Cream
Hi, Sebastian. Why there are no .xdelta files for KDE 4.2.1 sources? On FTP
I see only tarballs. :(
Forwarding to the release-team list, as I
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:53:26 Richard Moore wrote:
Proposed mail http://pastebin.ca/1339313
Looks fine, thanks.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Tom Albers tomalb...@kde.nl wrote:
At Monday 16 February 2009 21:33, you wrote:
We appear to have totally dropped the ball regarding
On Monday 19 January 2009 14:27:17 Allen Winter wrote:
I guess we are still on track for 4.2.0 tagging in the next couple days?
There is the report of 1 possible show-stopper in KMail -- I will
investigate what's happening with that.
Dirk, can you send a kde-cvs-announce message reminding
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:55:54 Dirk Mueller wrote:
on our road towards KDE 4.2 RC1 tagging (tonight), I've just branched KDE
4.2 into /branches/KDE/4.2 from trunk/KDE svn revision 906698 (yes, I
couldn't wait for 906700).
Any commit after 906698 that is intended to be part of KDE 4.2 has
Hi Jure,
On Saturday 27 December 2008 20:57:32 Jure Repinc wrote:
I hope I'm writing to the right mailing list about this and I hope it is
not too early to answer this answer at this time.
Linux Users Group of Slovenia is planning a little KDE 4.2 release party.
We would need to reserve the
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 23:37:43 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Beta2 tarballs tagged and uploaded. Please report any issues you might
find.
Note that kdevplatform and kdevelop does not build with those tarballs
anymore, we need a new release. I was under the impression that there is a
new
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:48:59 Tom Albers wrote:
Communicate that bugfixing is still a top priority until 4.2.0 is
released.
You said it yourself: bug fixing is top priority, why make it more
difficult? I am against prematurely thawing trunk as quite a few
developers will shift
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:27:45 Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Why would you want to backport patches to a tag? It's either branch/
(4.1.x) or trunk (next release of that is beta2). Tags are not supposed
to change after a release, which for 4.1.80 a.k.a beta1 has happened :).
Because I
On Friday 28 November 2008 00:21:54 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2008 14:19:01 Allen Winter wrote:
We are nearing the KDE 4.2 Beta2 tagging in less than 2 weeks (9 Dec).
If Opensync 0.40 is not available a few days before that time, then we'll
have no choice but to
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 23:31:23 Jonas Bähr wrote:
Since 2.0.0 would be our first KDE-4 release, it would be an
acceptable point to beginn with a blank history. Sebastian, you
mentioned possibly losing history as a disadvantage. Does this mean
there is a chance to keep our history? Under
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 15:19:20 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Let me try to shine some light on some of the questions raised in the
should krusader move into KDE's SVN? discussion. Please reply to both
lists, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and release-team@kde.org
Which won't work because apparently you
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 02:08:16 Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Question: are API changes allowed after feature freeze? I'd like to
work a bit on the Solid bluetooth stuff and that will probably require
slight API changes.
Fwd to release-team ...
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 09:22:46 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Maybe to complement the feature list for 4.2 modules maintainers or apps
maintainers can also drop you a mail with some explanations.
For example in KDE-Edu we have KBruch which was unmaintained and has been
picked by Brazilian
Howdy, (Allen style)
Now we're in feature-freeze, I'm trying to work out what went into KDE 4.2 and
what didn't make it. First impression: It's HUGE. Really. We're looking at a
very solid and vastly improved KDE 4.2. From my personal experience, it's
already pretty stable even. With two months
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
Release Goals as in unclear items?
I'm planning, as part of my prep 4.2 release to
On Monday 03 November 2008 00:43:32 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 4:12:29 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also
On Thursday 30 October 2008 18:52:03 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 30 October 2008 7:35:25 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Today we are supposed to get the tagging of 4.1.3 and techbase says
there are no more planned 4.1.x releases, should i
On Sunday 14 September 2008 17:50:15 Allen Winter wrote:
I want to let everyone know that I am now employed by KDAB.
I am not currently assigned any specific KDE development tasks,
but that could change in the future.
This new job will definitely impact the amount of time I have for KDE.
I
On Friday 05 September 2008 15:01:48 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim
enterprise. But the rest of the kdepim team will be moving onto
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:45:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
KDE 4.1.1 tagging planned for Thursday morning (this week). I'd like to
announce the usual wednesday 23:59 UTC rule and in light of the new
bugzilla, I would like to use the kde-4.1.1-blocker keyword for tagging
bugs that have to be fixed
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 17:39:48 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:45:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
KDE 4.1.1 tagging planned for Thursday morning (this week). I'd like to
announce the usual wednesday 23:59 UTC rule and in light of the new
bugzilla, I would like to use
On Thursday 21 August 2008 14:24:13 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to
fix two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_
doubts about the testing that
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:36:06 Benoit Minisini wrote:
I am currently committing patches to kicker for KDE 3.5.10.
Those won't make it int 3.5.10, but if we gather enough changes, that would
warrant a 3.5.11 in a couple of months. (I see Tobias also did a size limit
for the trash.)
Some
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 18:52:39 Benoit Minisini wrote:
On mardi 19 août 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 schrieb Benoit Minisini:
On mardi 19 août 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 18 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 12:53
On Sunday 17 August 2008 17:19:06 Matt Rogers wrote
I'm afraid I don't follow anything in the first paragraph after the
first 20 words or so. Perhaps you could clarify a bit more?
Next year's Akademy is one month earlier than this year's. This year, it
worked rather nicely, being able to
Just a reminder for those at Akademy right now, the Development Model BoF
following up Dirk's and my talk during the conference part will be held today,
between 11.00 - 12.00 in BoF room 1.
I hope to find the time next week to publish the slides along with some
explanation.
Hope to see you
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 12:48:46 Dirk Mueller wrote:
There have been 20803 commits that made it into KDE 4.1 branch, 15432
translation checkins. almost 35000 commits have been done in work branches,
some of them also being merged into /trunk, so those were not even counted.
Great work
On Monday 21 July 2008 15:58:17 Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Helio Chissini de Castro ha scritto:
On Monday 21 July 2008 10:32:16 Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears
On Monday 21 July 2008 17:06:55 Rex Dieter wrote:
Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
One of the critical/annoying kind:
* okular: print pdf produces no output, also print to file broken :
http://bugs.kde.org/161759
Blame Trolltech, not Okular.
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 17:20:40 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:33:45 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 15:12:07 Allen Winter wrote:
I think we should keep the same schedule from 4.1,
except time-shifted forward 6months, like so:
Sun 19 Oct: Soft
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:53:56 Cyrille Berger wrote:
Is RC1 still planned for today ? I need to know to set the date of KOffice
Alpha9 and avoid doing it the same day as KDE RC1.
Yup, it'll be out later this afternoon, I guess in ~2hours.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:17:38 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 06:36:44 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
so the time of RC1 tagging has come (tonight/tomorrow). I would like to
hear comments/list of todo items from each module maintainer that would
block RC1.
(Yes,
On Friday 27 June 2008 14:18:22 Stephan Kulow wrote:
I asked the packagers the last days and there seems to be still high
interest in the KDE 3.5 branch.
4 months have passed by now since 3.5.9 release and I would give it
after KDE 4.1 and then release 3.5.10 mid of august. What do you think?
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:28:27 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi,
I'll be on vacation next week so I don't expect to have a reliable Internet
connection (nor the guts to tell my girlfriend that I have to work) to do
the release announcement for beta1 and website updating dance next Tuesday
I've updated the Feature Plan with what seems to have made it into the Beta
release. Boy is this an impressive list.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.1_Release_Goals
I chickened out at KDE-PIM (scary, scary long list of things) and the new
platforms (as I'm not sure about their
Hi,
I'll be on vacation next week so I don't expect to have a reliable Internet
connection (nor the guts to tell my girlfriend that I have to work) to do the
release announcement for beta1 and website updating dance next Tuesday.
If anyone else can step up, please do so. I can explain and help
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 13:45:32 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Thanks for the trust
Thanks for stepping up, Friedrich.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 27 March 2008 21:36:25 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
IIRC for KDE 3.5 there was an xml file to accumulate the various
changes (specially features) that were done. Does something like that
exist for KDE 4.1 too? I mean besides the feature planning page on
techbase. Where do I find it if
20 April is the new soft freeze deadline. From the Release Schedule [R], we
learn that features you want to work on after that deadline (and that should
get into 4.1) need to be in the Feature Plan. [F]
The release team has been asked for a bit more time, there are at least two
sprints
On Monday 31 March 2008 15:27:31 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 17:59:52 Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi everyone,
according to [1] the KDE 4.1 feature plan is open until 31 March 2008.
Will spotted that the date in the release schedule is 7th April, he fixed it
in the Feature
On Monday 31 March 2008 16:08:19 Allen Winter wrote:
FWIW, we're having a plasma sprint during the same weekend (10th - 15th),
I take it we might get away with the occasional feature addition as well?
Other than that, I'm about to add Plasma features to the Feature Plan
after kicking
On Friday 28 March 2008 22:45:31 Tom Albers wrote:
Just uploaded them. Changes:
- kmdonkey is readded, compiles for me on hardy now
- kio_gopher is ported from KDE3 and will be shipped from now on.
Does anyone have a list with applications shipped with the extragear tarball?
I need to finish
On Saturday 29 March 2008 14:22:04 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Saturday 29 March 2008 14:18 schreef u:
On Friday 28 March 2008 22:45:31 Tom Albers wrote:
Just uploaded them. Changes:
- kmdonkey is readded, compiles for me on hardy now
- kio_gopher is ported from KDE3 and will be shipped from
On Monday 18 February 2008 15:59:31 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Freitag 15 Februar 2008 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
.. is on ktown for the packagers to grab since tuesday.
So it looks like we can start rollout :)
Is everything in place? I'd put the binary.inc and source.inc
in place
It's done. :-)
Congratulations everyone, and a huge thanks, especially to those behind the
screens (you know who you are!).
The release went without hitches and relatively stress-free (not counting the
tension in the air, of course). The press has the news, www.kde.org is
updated, Dot and
On Friday 11 January 2008 16:06:23 Dirk Mueller wrote:
January 30th for tagging 4.0.1?
+1
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:50:14 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 11:34:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
Not perfect, but it's a start. Comments?
I miss the following information:
a) Why was July chosen? Was it because it is 4.0 + 6months? So if it is
old release + 6months, then we go back
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 12:41:05 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
Not sure about the root cause here, but Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu have
6 months schedules. For them, it's an advantage to have a new desktop
version
Sorry to step in, but openSUSE
On Monday 07 January 2008 15:26:21 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Tue 08 Jan 2008 07:25:53 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 11:34:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
Not perfect, but it's a start. Comments?
I miss
On Monday 07 January 2008 13:51:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
anyone want to start the lead on 4.1 planning? I would like to align with
the timebased schedule, which means a release around September. I think
something around April would be rather short, but I'm open to suggestions.
It is unclear to
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:22:56 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
What about doing a new minor release each 3 weeks, setting this as fixed
time? At least for the first period.
3 weeks is really much too often. We'd be tag-frozen half the time and spent a
couple of days a week rolling tarballs and
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 02:14:02 Matt Rogers wrote:
Why exactly do the distros matter when planning our releases? (I know
I've asked this and it's been explained before, but I still don't get
it. Perhaps I never will.)
Distros are the ones that get our software to the user. KDE is a 'raw'
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:10:36 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 05:08:09 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 11 December 2007 03:14 schreef u:
If Kevin wants to take over maintenance, that's fine, but making
Kompare ready for KDE 4.0 seems like a goal not reachable
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:30:29 Rex Dieter wrote:
Regardless, I'd argue they should be in the loop here in any discussions
that involve any further delays in the release schedule. (CC'ing
kde-promo?)
I consider myself the contact point for them, so that's fine. Thanks for the
[CC:ing ev-marketing anyway.]
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 15:08:50 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.11.07 07:30:29, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Rex Dieter wrote:
If this is absolutely the last slip, sure. Otherwise, the release
party scheduled
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:30:49 Torsten Rahn wrote:
- QToolBox (Can someone show me what's wrong? I fail to find the issue
here)
Well,last time I checked the whole QToolBox-Widget didn't get painted at
all in Oxygen.
This means that e.g. Marble (which uses QToolBox) can't be used as
The Release Team would like to see all KDE developers get into Release Mode.
This means:
- only bugfixes
- focus on the most visible components
- do polishing changes of the user interface now
One very important point of this is that we need to stop thinking in terms of
the pieces we usually
On Thursday 15 November 2007 12:46:01 Stephan Kulow wrote:
So executive summary: If you plan for only one RC, you can just as well
plan KDE 4.0.1 right away.
Good points there.
What we do with an -rc is
- raise expectations
- get more people to try it
- communicate that we're more confident
Torsten,
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 23:05:24 Torsten Rahn wrote:
I'd say this is quite off base
No. It's not. Sebastian has advocated that the only way to push a project
forward means _skewing_ technical terms for release states and
_disregarding_ matter-of-fact criteria for a release.
201 - 300 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
