Hello all,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote:
Why cancel instead of just telling people the need to update to soprano from
git?
Scott K
I think that most of the discussion here is based off of a
miscommunication caused by the title of this thread.
Since we don't have a soprano release we can depend off I'm officially
cancelling the tarballs of Beta1 since it makes no sense to release something
that can't be compiled.
If the soprano people make a release I'll re-create the packages and we'll
speak for dates for a new release.
Sorry for
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Since we don't have a soprano release we can depend off I'm officially
cancelling the tarballs of Beta1 since it makes no sense to release
something that can't be compiled.
Uh, we've already started importing the beta into Fedora Rawhide (using
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:15:08, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Since we don't have a soprano release we can depend off I'm officially
cancelling the tarballs of Beta1 since it makes no sense to release
something that can't be
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not respecting
the dependency freeze.
Oh by the way, this is not the first time a prerelease of the KDE SC depends on
a git snapshot of Soprano, either (sadly). So it's not so big a
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not respecting
the dependency freeze.
Oh by the way, this is not the first time a prerelease of the KDE SC
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not
respecting
the dependency freeze.
Oh by the way, this is not the first time a prerelease of
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 13:45:34, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va
escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 19:55:02 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Please do not confuse team work with democracy. I like team work, I do take
suggestions, but at the end each person in a team has a given role and a
given attributions for that role, the release dude does the releases.
+1
And as
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 20:19:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
so we need a soprano release. i'll try and push people to get this done.
it's one tag / tarball, it can't be a big deal.
ok, just talked with one of the devs. apparently Trueg is MIA while moving
house at the moment, but it is releasable
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 20:45:14, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
ok, just talked with one of the devs. apparently Trueg is MIA while moving
house at the moment, but it is releasable and there are even release notes
for a 2.8 version.
we'll (myself an vhanda) make a release
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 20:49:05 Manuel Tortosa wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 20:45:14, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
ok, just talked with one of the devs. apparently Trueg is MIA while moving
house at the moment, but it is releasable and there are even release notes
for a
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va
escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not
respecting
the dependency freeze.
Oh by the way, this is not
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm not. You've known about this since Saturday. AFAIK didn't consult
packagers on impacts. Made a late announcement (if you were going to do
this, waiting three days did't help). Then you give a very pointed
response to anyone who questions
Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, 22:35:23 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm not. You've known about this since Saturday. AFAIK didn't consult
packagers on impacts. Made a late announcement (if you were going to do
this, waiting three days did't help).
Hi,
For those distro's that already uploaded packages to their repo's, I suggest
that you add a patch that removes the 'beta 1' designation and just continue to
upload it as a trunk snapshot if you can not stop it anymore. I assume you have
only uploaded it to an unstable part of the repo.
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 15:10:18, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 07:55:02 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 13:45:34, Scott Kitterman va
escriure:
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 22:35:23, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm not. You've known about this since Saturday. AFAIK didn't consult
packagers on impacts. Made a late announcement (if you were going to do
this, waiting three days
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 23:08:50, Adrian Schröter va escriure:
Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, 22:35:23 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm not. You've known about this since Saturday. AFAIK didn't consult
packagers on impacts. Made a late
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 5:11:20 PM Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
For those distro's that already uploaded packages to their repo's, I suggest
that you add a patch that removes the 'beta 1' designation and just continue
to upload it as a trunk snapshot if you can not stop it anymore. I assume you
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 19:55:02 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
the release dude does the releases.
Correction:
The release *team* does the releases
Now that is clear, can we work as a team here, and discuss problems instead of
making such decisions unilaterally?
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 23:29:18, Sebastian Kügler va escriure:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 19:55:02 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
the release dude does the releases.
Correction:
The release *team* does the releases
Now that is clear, can we work as a team here, and discuss
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 23:53:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'm sorry for being naïve and expecting people would care about having a
proper release. It won't happen again.
Noe this It won't happen again doesn't mean I'm walking off from the
create tarballs duty, it just means that
23 matches
Mail list logo
