Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)

2011-05-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 21 May 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Saturday 21 May 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: The turn of events with KDE 4.7.x is most unfortunate. I noticed an explosion of source tarballs. Yes, I started to resemble the git layout in the tarballs, given that I had a pain in the ass of

Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)

2011-05-22 Thread Ben Cooksley
2011/5/22 Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org: On Saturday 21 May 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: The turn of events with KDE 4.7.x is most unfortunate. I noticed an explosion of source tarballs. Yes, I started to resemble the git layout in the tarballs, given that I had a pain in the ass of work to

Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)

2011-05-22 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Saturday 21 May 2011 23:29:43 Dirk Mueller wrote: Can I get the opinion of the other distro packagers as well please? Personally I was much more happy with the previous module-based layout, though I can cope reasonable with the current situation as well. Any other opinon? Here in Arch Linux

Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)

2011-05-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
On Sunday 22 May 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote: So, what I'm doing right now for kdesupport is to create one CMakeLists.txt, which contains all the contained projects (automoc4, phonon, attica, akonadi, ...) via the externalproject()-feature from CMake. What it does, is it gets and updates

Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)

2011-05-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 22 May 2011, Kevin Kofler wrote: On Sunday 22 May 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote: So, what I'm doing right now for kdesupport is to create one CMakeLists.txt, which contains all the contained projects (automoc4, phonon, attica, akonadi, ...) via the externalproject()-feature from