On Saturday 24 February 2007 5:08:15 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Moin,
On Saturday 24 February 2007 02:13:56 Allen Winter wrote:
A few comments regarding the process and the announcement.
In no particular order.
- I suck. Sorry I didn't help more with Kludge. I didn't even have
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 12:53:34 pm Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
As Dirk and others have pointed out, we are trying to squeeze a bunch
of important events into a short period of time. So, I propose the following
changes to the KDE 4.0 and KDE 3.5.7 release plans:
Mon, 30 April: Merge
Howdy All,
A few things I *think* we have already decided for kdelibs 4.0,
but just for the record...
+ The kdelibs API is frozen (well, sort of. keep reading)
+ The kutils and kio/kssl subdirs are not frozen. They need lots of love and
attention.
In particular, Thiago says he can't get
On Monday 07 May 2007 10:22:35 am Emanuele A. Bagnaschi wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the developers of the Gentoo ebuilds for KDE4 (kde overlay)
and while testing this new release our group founds a few issues that we
think are worthwhile to report.
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to
Howdy,
A gentle reminder...
Milestone: Feature Freeze
Date: 1 June 2007
Goals:
+ Any new application from kdereview must be in place in its KDE main module.
+ The KDE main modules are frozen for new features.
+ The focus is on stabilizing the applications, fixing bugs, and improving art
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 5:45:03 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday, 22. May 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
+ The KDE main modules are frozen for new features.
at this point, this is rediculously optimistic. there are three realities
ahead of us:
I would s,new features,new applications,
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:12:45 am Allen Winter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 5:45:03 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday, 22. May 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
+ The KDE main modules are frozen for new features.
at this point, this is rediculously optimistic. there are three realities
Is the 3.5 branch open for new i18n strings yet?
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 8:59:23 am Johann Ollivier Lapeyre wrote:
Hi,
We said the 8th may, every apps should go in kdereview to be in their module
the 1st June. I've a special case in kdegame i'd like to submit you:
Kjumpingcube was moved the 3d May (if i remember well) to playground. But
On Friday 01 June 2007 11:18:42 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 16:49:10 Urs Wolfer wrote:
I'm right now not sure what to do with the kdenetwork module... Not all
apps are working very well atm. Matt Rogers (mattr) thinks that Kopete will
not be ready for 4.0. KRDC is also
On Monday 04 June 2007 5:05:12 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
[Adding release-team to CC:, asking for confirmation]
On Monday 04 June 2007 06:35:17 Wade Olson wrote:
Anyone know if we're still on track for a June 25, 2007 Beta 1 release?
On Monday 04 June 2007 1:02:31 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
trying this again =)
On Saturday 02 June 2007, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 00:21:45 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
i think that's everything; the only hitch is that june 1 was yesterday and
that was the deadling for moving
Howdy,
Note that the Monday June 25 Beta1 Release Milestone
is fast approaching. I'd like to make the following
clarifications and date changes to the schedule:
1. First, I'd like to change the date to 26 June so that
we may have 1 final big changes Monday on 25 June
2. Change
From this date
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 5:57:04 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:56:13 Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Note that the Monday June 25 Beta1 Release Milestone
is fast approaching. I'd like to make the following
clarifications and date changes to the schedule:
1
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 8:29:23 pm Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 5:57:04 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:56:13 Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Note that the Monday June 25 Beta1
On Thursday 14 June 2007 9:29:20 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 15:04:41 Allen Winter wrote:
Dirk can do the tagging either Monday 25 June or Wednesday 27 June.
If we go with the 27th, then we can squeeze in one more BIC Monday.
But that is really cutting it close
Howdy,
My second attempt at this...
Unless there are objections, I'd like to make the following
changes to the plan:
1. Change the tagging date to Wednesday 27 June,
which allows us to squeeze in a last BIC Monday on the 25th.
2. Change
From this date forward, a Beta Release will be published
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 10:00:32 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday, 19. June 2007, Johann Ollivier Lapeyre wrote:
I agree to the proposal.
agree too
How about we delay beta1 to two weeks after the end of akademy. Then we can
do
an alpha2 instead.
Ouch :)
No comprendo.
Please
Howdy,
I made the changes to the Release Roadmap [1] as we have discussed
in this thread. Please review.
The highlights:
* 27 June is our next release tagging
* The next release is an Alpha2
* We currently only have 2 betas planned now.
All the other milestones remain the same, namely:
Howdy,
We, the KDE 4.0 release team, are attempting to get our core APIs
to a stable state. Toward that goal, we need to know if will be
possible to have your kdesupport library APIs frozen by
the KDE 4.0 beta1 tagging, scheduled for late July 2007.
i.e, we'd like to have qca, strigi, soprano,
Howdy,
So, are we in agreement that the kdelibs+kdesupport API
hard freeze date will be moved from the alpha2 tagging
to the beta1 tagging?
i.e, Monday 23 July instead of Monday 25 June?
Objections?
We need to let the developers know about this as soon as possible.
-Allen
Howdy,
The Release Team officially announces the following changes
to the KDE4.0 Release Roadmap [1]:
* 27 June: Alpha2 Tagging
* 24 July: Core Libs API Freeze (includes kdesupport, kdelibs, kdepimlibs)
* 25 July: Beta1 Tagging
Basically, we are adding another alpha release and moving the
first
As some of us are not subscribed to kde-ev-marketing, could we please
have a little more background? Like what is the gamma proposal
and what is Mountainview??
On Saturday 07 July 2007 9:33:56 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:55, Troy Unrau wrote:
The proposal is to
On Friday 06 July 2007 12:55:00 pm Troy Unrau wrote:
Okay folks,
I talked to many people at Akademy already about this idea, but Dirk
suggested that I send it to the mailing list to make it a little more
official and through official channels.
Officially speaking as an official module
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 3:02:54 pm Thiago Macieira wrote:
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
deemed ready) without an official to the rest of the world
announcement. this allows us to push 4.0 out to the community -and-
create a media
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 6:30:33 am Matthias Kretz wrote:
Hi,
would it be possible to delay the Phonon API freeze one or two more weeks?
Reason: since I finally have other people looking at the API and questioning
the design (i.e. Trolltech) we're able to improve quite a few things. Now I'd
On Thursday 12 July 2007 5:30:54 am Matthias Kretz wrote:
Hi,
as long as nobody else steps up I'll try to act as Release Maintainer for
kdemultimedia. Let me know what I just signed up to. :-)
Welcome.
In kdemultimedia, the hard part will be to decide which apps should
be part of a KDE
On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:50:00 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Monday, 9. July 2007, Alexander Dymo wrote:
As a russian saying states, do not call the devil your brother... Why
inventing names instead of shifting the schedule by 3 months?
We're not shifting by 3 months, we're just waiting 3
Howdy,
According to the current plan we are scheduled for the
Application Feature Freeze to start on 25 July (12 days from now).
That doesn't seem realistic to me.
Should we move the feature freeze to start with the second
Beta instead (25 Aug)? or with the first Release Candidate (25 Sep)?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: KDE 4.0 Feature Freeze
Date: Saturday 14 July 2007
From: Henrique Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Allen,
On Sat 14 Jul 2007 09:44, Allen Winter wrote:
Keep in mind that we really want to concentrate on simply making
On Monday 16 July 2007 2:58:24 am Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi!
Only few of them are new - most aren't updated since months.
What I need from you is a story about every of these.
Greetings, Stephan
Potentially obsolete .pot files:
2007-03-22 templates/messages/kdepim/kabc2mutt.pot
I'll fix
On Saturday 21 July 2007 9:02:16 am Urs Wolfer wrote:
Hi all
We need to decide what to do with KRDC. I have rewritten this app as GSoC
project [1]. I know that trunk is frozen for some time already for new /
resurrected apps; but IMHO this is a special case. KRDC in trunk is quite
Howdy,
No, I don't think we are ready for a beta release and the API + Feature Freeze
that goes with a beta release.
I think we should tag an Alpha3 on 25 July and extend our freeze dates
forward another month.
Then try again for a Beta1 on 25 Aug.
This probably means delaying KDE 4.0 for at
On Sunday 22 July 2007 6:36:14 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007 00:00, Tom Albers wrote:
Op za 21 jul 2007 18:44 schreef u:
No, I don't think we are ready for a beta release and the API + Feature
Freeze that goes with a beta release.
I think we should tag an
On Friday 03 August 2007 2:42:50 am Stephan Kulow wrote:
kdgantt1.pot
Apparently koffice once had a copy of kgantt1.
But not anymore.
So koffice/kdgantt1.pot can be removed.
-Allen
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
Howdy,
According to the milestones [1] we are currently in a message freeze.
Obviously that needs to be changed.
When would be a good time to have the message freeze?
After the second beta (25 Aug)? After the first release candidate?
What release should start having translations?
-Allen,
On Friday 31 August 2007 1:13:17 pm Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 1:07:32 pm Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday, 29. August 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
defect in my mind, 'cause some people can actually plan all releases up
to 17 januari ;-) )
Of course this all assumes
On Saturday 01 September 2007 6:55:57 pm Matt Rogers wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 11:45:07 am Thomas Zander wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 17:30:34 Matt Rogers wrote:
That's no different than what we have now. The problem
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 9:17:11 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Here's a proposal for a revised release schedule, taking into account comment
by various people over the last week. Especially Dirk being on vacation and
the release date being to close to Christmas are major flaws in the
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 12:50:45 pm David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to know your opinions about the idea of skipping a beta.
I think we might not have so much progress as we wanted to, so we
might as well skip a beta and try
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:28:06 am Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Tom Albers wrote:
At Tuesday 25 September 2007 15:17, you wrote:
as for Konqueror ... we have a file manager that is in good shape, we
need a power user browser and a web browser (konqi currently
On Monday 01 October 2007 1:06:38 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday, 25. September 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
And if that's still not clear, that can well be because doing complex
sentences in english is not my strong point, i'll rephrase it.
I have hope we can have them working for
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 10:18:45 am David Faure wrote:
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 15:55:30 Dirk Mueller wrote:
7 modules are failing at the moment.
situation is a lot better now, thanks to everyone who helped. Still the
On Thursday 11 October 2007 12:34:17 pm Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
The freeze for the platform is here, and thanks to questions from Lubos about
the old mediamanager I noticed that the media ioslave is still in
kdebase/runtime... while I somehow thought I removed it weeks ago.
I'm not
Howdy,
Dirk thinks we need to move the Total Freeze day, currently scheduled for
Friday 19 Oct (tomorrow), forward a couple days to give us more time to
work over the weekend. I agree.
Of course, this means we will need to move the big tagging day forward as well.
So I propose these new
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 06:50:19 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 23:17:27 Allen Winter wrote:
Regarding the proposed RC1:
1) we just managed to get Beta3 out the door last week.
2) according to [1] ... The Beta Cycle will continue until the critical
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:59:05 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:27:05 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
(all deadlines are due 23:59 UTC)
24 October (Wed): KDE 4.0 Release Freeze
I don`t really like to
Howdy,
The okular developers are ready to take over full responsibility for .ps files.
And it doesn't seem that kghostview4 works at all.
So it is time to follow through with the plan [1] to Move to extragear pending
GS
support in Okular (currently WIP)
However, it seems that kghostview is
SVN commit 733219 by winterz:
So long kghostview.
Long live okular.
CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M +0 -8 CMakeLists.txt
M +0 -3 README
M +0 -1 doc/CMakeLists.txt
D doc/kghostview (directory)
D kghostview (directory)
M
On Saturday 10 November 2007 10:14:04 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
As a conclusion to the thread this week I want to propose to move everything
except kdewin32 to extragear/libs.
The reason is that as far as i know all libs in there have provided tarballs
which are the requirement for
SVN commit 735376 by winterz:
remove qca build as discussed on the Release Team mailing list.
CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M +3 -1 CMakeLists.txt
--- trunk/kdesupport/CMakeLists.txt #735375:735376
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
include(MacroOptionalAddSubdirectory.cmake)
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 12:33:45 pm Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:52 schreef u:
Reading back on the beta5 or rc1 thread it seems like most people
are for keeping to this schedule; i.e. no beta5.
Just for the record, I don't agree to it. We've set up beta goals so we
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 19:28:42 Allen Winter wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 12:33:45 pm Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:52 schreef u:
Reading back on the beta5 or rc1 thread it seems like most people
are for keeping to this schedule; i.e. no beta5.
Just
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 09:28:52 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I`ve tagged the current state of things as KDE 3.96. Tarballs should be ready
in a few hours.
For the desktop, I`m unsure what to do. I`m fine with naming it RC1 or Gamma
state or Beta5. Opinions?
My opinion :
name it
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 16:49:33 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
We go ahead with the platform plans though? Can we push the distro's !=
openSUSE to provide 3.96 platform packages so that 3rd party developers have
something to rely on?
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 17:40:29 Johann Ollivier Lapeyre wrote:
Hi,
On kdegames many changes was done on apps for KDE4.0, and some of our guys
worked very hard to have up to date docbook. Unfortunatly, wasn't done at
time for the string freeze.
We have the 2 last games dockbook and
On Monday 12 November 2007 07:51:41 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can we have it back already?
I`m not opposed to re-enabling it, as long as the number of checks that are
enabled are important to us (e.g. the licensing check). I do not want
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 04:07:53 Tom Albers wrote:
Op dinsdag 20 november 2007 23:48 schreef u:
It is not possible to generate language docbooks in a pure kde4
environment
(no po2xml in kde4), you have to use po2xml from kde3
didn't Tom Albers fix this recently?
No, I
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 16:15:58 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 04:07:53 Tom Albers wrote:
Op dinsdag 20 november 2007 23:48 schreef u:
It is not possible to generate language docbooks in a pure kde4
environment
(no po2xml in kde4), you have to use po2xml
Note to all:
We need to remind authors/maintainers to increase the version numbers
on the applications before taggings.
Which brings up Dirk's (IIRC) idea of automatically assigning version numbers
based on the KDE release number.
Anyhow... something for the pre-tagging To-do List...
-Allen
On Friday 23 November 2007 13:03:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Divendres 23 Novembre 2007, Allen Winter va escriure:
Note to all:
We need to remind authors/maintainers to increase the version numbers
on the applications before taggings.
I nagged all kdegames maintainers, so you can
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 10:19:36 Burkhard Lück wrote:
Am Dienstag 20 November 2007 23:48:53 schrieb Allen Winter:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 03:33:23 Burkhard Lück wrote:
Some other broken things regarding doctranslation:
autogen.sh:
autogen.sh??
l10n-kde4/scripts/autogen.sh
Howdy,
Are we willing to permit BIC changes to the Dev Platform?
If so, under what conditions?
There are still requests coming into k-c-d for BIC changes to kdelibs
and I'm sure there have been such changes since the hard freeze
went into effect.
For example, ossi's KCoreConfigSkeleton patch..
On Friday 30 November 2007 14:34:51 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi,
from http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Module_Status#Module_Status I
read there is no Release Maintainer for kdeutils. So who decides/cares there?
I guess this list, then.
The Release Team, so I'll copy this
On Sunday 02 December 2007 11:02:58 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
Hi,
ok, so KDE 4.0 has been delayed by around a month. Does this open another
window to do some string changes (if so, for how long), or does the string
freeze remain in effect?
All freezes (API, feature, string) remain in
On Friday 30 November 2007 22:12:21 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday 30 November 2007 14:34:51 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi,
from http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Module_Status#Module_Status
I
read there is no Release Maintainer for kdeutils. So who decides/cares
Dear Release Team.
Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message.
And so are many of the KDEPIM apps.
Only KAlarm, KTimeTracker (formerly KArm) and a few other support tools
will be ready for release. I can't see KMail, KNode, Akregator, Kontact or
KPilot
being ready ..
SVN commit 747074 by winterz:
Apply patch5 from Kevin which makes kompare work for KDE 4.0.
It also ports over some things from the 3_way_kompare branch.
This is the first time that kompare builds in trunk.
I'm doing this for Kevin until he gets his own SVN account.
Oh, and Kevin is the new
On Monday 10 December 2007 18:18:04 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Excellent. Great News!
Then I suggest you:
1) commit your patches into kdesdk/kompare
2) uncomment the add_subdirectory(kompare) line in kdesdk/CMakeLists.txt
I need SVN commit access for that first.
Ok, I committed your
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 18:07:43 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
Apply patch5 from Kevin which makes kompare work for KDE 4.0.
It also ports over some things from the 3_way_kompare branch.
This is the first time that kompare builds in trunk
Howdy,
Please see Andreas Hartmetz's message in kde-core-devel
entitled Request to merge the newssl branch.
Nobody has responded to the message yet.
But we should make a quick decision.
Merging the branch might give us the possibility of releasing
KMail (and of kdepim) in 4.0.
-Allen
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 13:14:27 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:47:15 Allen Winter wrote:
Please see Andreas Hartmetz's message in kde-core-devel
entitled Request to merge the newssl branch.
Nobody has responded to the message yet.
I'm
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 12:47:15 Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Please see Andreas Hartmetz's message in kde-core-devel
entitled Request to merge the newssl branch.
Did we come to closure on this?
We really need an answer for Monday (tomorrow).
It seems we are leaning to the answer
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 06:20:19 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 22:04:20 Allen Winter wrote:
For 4.x, where x =1, I think we need to require maintainers for all our
modules.
While having a maintainer for a module or an application, I don't think it's
realistic
On Friday 14 December 2007 14:48:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Vir says it does not work and it's not expected to work.
So i ask myself why is it sitting in the place of the code we are going to
release in less than one month.
Can we please move it to somewhere were it should belong like
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:08:07 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
Yes. kdesdk is tops on my list of modules in need of a maintainer.
Consider it maintained by me then, please. I'm supposed to already be
maintaining cervisia, and I can
On Thursday 20 December 2007 11:16:17 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
For 4.x, where x =1, I think we need to require maintainers for all our
modules.
Can you clarify why this is a good idea and why we must require it?
And, I think we need
On Saturday 29 December 2007 11:47:25 Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
Some days ago the MacOS team found out that they need a macro to add
icons to their application. We (kde-windows) already have
KDE4_ADD_WIN32_APP_ICON and therefore it would be nice to create a
unique KDE4_ADD_APP_ICON for all
On Sunday 30 December 2007 18:50:40 Thiago Macieira wrote:
Allen Winter wrote:
So, we are ok with Andreas' hackery inside KTcpSocket. The only problem
occurs if someone tries to use QSslSocket directly. But I don't think
we need to worry about that much.. or do we?
No, we don't. Using
On Monday 31 December 2007 08:46:28 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
SVN commit 755123 by kossebau:
Moving KHexEdit to the Off, as dicussed with the release team.
Is only halfways ported to KDE4 (compiles at least) and has no active
maintainer.
Let's hope Okteta is ready for KDE 4.1 to
On Thursday 03 January 2008 05:31:33 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
So we could conceivably go back to requiring Qt 4.3.3 instead of
qt-copy+patches. Comments?
Indeed, we can not require a patched Qt version. I think the workaround is
fine and we should
On Friday 04 January 2008 04:59:04 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
Anyway... how to proceed? Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0 tarball?
Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime.
Are we going forward with that idea of dropping kdepim
On Thursday 03 January 2008 21:19:39 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
Hello,
as there have been some issues, I just wanted to give a green light in
behalf of the whole Oxygen team: every little piece we've preventivated has
fallen into its place, works nicely, and we're ready and set for a great
On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote:
I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk.
Bye
urs
I will do so. But first I need to add 4.1 apidox to api.kde.org.
Should I enable all Krazy checks in extragear, playground, kdereview
and koffice too?
On Sunday 06 January 2008 16:27:17 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote:
I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk.
Bye
urs
On Saturday 05 January 2008 20:57:52 Allen Winter wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote:
I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk.
Bye
urs
I will do so. But first I need to add 4.1 apidox to api.kde.org.
Should I enable all Krazy checks
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:37:42 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dilluns 07 Gener 2008, Dirk Mueller va escriure:
Hi,
are there any opinions about 4.0.x release plans already? I would like
to schedule 4.0.x releases in roughly monthly
Howdy,
I think we should move kwalletmanager from kdeutils into kdebase/apps.
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be available in our
base system.
Comments? Objections?
PS. we still don't have a kdeutils module coordinator :(
___
On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be available
in our base system.
More critical than kmix
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:52:57 Thomas Zander wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
I think we should move kwalletmanager from kdeutils into kdebase/apps.
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be available
in our base system.
Hmm
On Friday 11 January 2008 10:06:23 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
January 30th for tagging 4.0.1?
+1
who wants to update the schedule page on techbase :)
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
On Friday 11 January 2008 14:14:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Divendres 11 Gener 2008, Sebastian Kuegler va escriure:
On Friday 11 January 2008 19:11:58 Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephan Kulow wrote:
I wanted to wait with it after 4.0 and I don't mind if we don't do it
at all, but there were
On Saturday 12 January 2008 09:44:36 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
For the rc2 and for the final release we've been creating tarballs of
extragear applications. I've taken the time to evaluate this based on
feedback with different packers. I will try to keep it short and to the
point.
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 19:14:28 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since
the discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been
said. My impression from re-reading all those emails is that most people
would like
Howdy,
It strikes me that we never defined the role of a module coordinator.
I think we should come up with a clear definition -- so maybe we
know what the heck we are supposed to be doing.. and maybe help
us recruit and get the right people in the right roles.
The current list of coordinators
Howdy,
FYI, I put some actual content into the 4.1 Release Goals page [1].
This content was pasted from Sebas' blog, which started out
from an email by Aaron. And then I tweaked it a bit.
Please review and modify as necessary.
-Allen
[1]
Howdy Nick,
According to [1], we wanted to move KAider into the kdesdk module
for KDE 4.1.
Are you still planning to make this move from extragear?
If so, please make the move at your earliest convenience.
If not, please let us know.
-Allen, KDE Release Team
[1]
On Monday 21 January 2008 09:56:46 Allen Winter wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008 12:33:54 Nick Shaforostoff wrote:
В сообщении от Saturday 19 January 2008 6:40:05 pm Allen Winter
написал(а):
According to [1], we wanted to move KAider into the kdesdk module
for KDE 4.1.
Are you
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:22:30 Allen Winter wrote:
Dear Translators,
The Release Team and the KDEPIM Team would like to merge the kdepim
enterprise branch into the 3.5 kdepim branch so that all future 3.5.x
releases have all the bugfixes and neat features that the Kolab Consortium
[1
On Sunday 27 January 2008 09:28:21 Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
Op zondag 27 januari 2008, schreef Allen Winter:
These two branches are very similar. But, there are some new features
that contain i18n strings which you would need to translate. We
estimate less than 100 strings need
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
