Doug
Some while ago you asked about literature
about responses to the Courts prayer decisions.
See WK Muir, Law and attitude change: Prayer
in the Public Schools (University of Chicago 1973).I have a copy.
Marc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
What's remarkable is that the Court did exactly the
opposite of what the SG urged -- it granted in Cutter and held in
Bass v. Madison. Therefore not onlymust defenders of the
statutefile their briefs topside, but they must address all of the
constitutional arguments-- Commerce andSpending,
Like many seminaries, the seminary division of the school where I teach offers an M.A. in Biblical counseling requiring about 1 year of graduate work in religion and one year of graduate work in counseling. The degree is not designed to prepare graduate for licensure or professional practice
In the Nally v. Grace Community Church (Cal. 1986 or
so, the Court of Appeals held a pastoral counselor liable for "clergy
malpractice" because he did not "effectively" refer the
counselee to a secular psychologist. That seems to be the opposite of
the regulatory theory of rule 2 below.
In