In a message dated 7/23/2005 2:28:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI, it
is not a child, it is a fetus.
And fetus, you see, is derived from latin, and means, "little one."
This begs the question that follows, "little one" what?
In a recent thread, it was
In a message dated 7/23/2005 2:28:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keep you
laws off my body. Your religious views are not the same as mine, and
you have no right to impose them on me against my will. I am more
important than the contents of my womb, and FYI,
Even if we take the medical language of pregnacy seriously, it tells us nothing about who is a person and who isn't.
The unborn child is called a "fetus," and her mother is calleda "gravida." So now that we have masked both the child and her mother with technical terminology, let us remove the
In a message dated 7/23/2005 10:17:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
problem, in terms of conflict, it seems to me, arises, not from use of the
public square, but from the desire on the part of some to use government space
and property for the promotion of
I don't think "public spaces" gets us much further than "public squares."
Frances R. A. Paterson, J.D., Ed.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Educational Leadership
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
___
To post, send message to
The difference between the
public square and government sponsorshipis the point at which both sides
in the culture warsstart cheating with their claims about the current law.
The Court has never held that private religious speech may or must be censored
because it occurs on government
