I've noticed that a couple of my
posts have been forwarded to other lists, or posted on someone's blog,
without my permission. (In particular, one of my recent posts [on the conlawprof
list] on Harriet Miers's church was forwarded to another list [not to the
religionlaw list].) I would
I don't know what the rules are either, or if there are any
rules. But I will give this example of my personal practice. When a
reporter for a major newspaper called to ask me about Harriet Miers's church,
and most of what I knew about that church came from Mark's posts, I did not
quote
I just got a copy of the Complaint in this lawsuit (Weinstein v.
U.S. Air Force), and here's the claim for relief:
26. Plaintiff is entitled to the permanent injunctive relief that
the USAF, Defendant Geren and its senior leadership adopt and adhere to
the following policies:
a.
I searched religionlaw, in
Google, which brought up the Religionlaw archive page. Searching religionlaw
Mark Scarberry (nothing personal, Mark) also brought up something called
opensubscriber.com, which also indexes the religionlaw list.So I suppose a
reporter who wanted to know what
I have used posts made to this list on my own blog without asking for
permission because the archives are published on the web for all to
see. I simply link to the web version of the message when I do so. I
have seen that procedure followed widely on listservs with web
accessible archives for
I'm speechless. No pun intended.
Chaplain Klingenschmitt
"Volokh, Eugene" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a copy of the Complaint in this lawsuit (Weinstein v.U.S. Air Force), and here's the claim for relief:26. Plaintiff is entitled to the permanent injunctive relief thatthe USAF,
Of course this item in the complaint must be groundless. The act of
administering the Eucharist is considered -- even intentionally -- to be an
evangelistic act by many theological groups (especially Eastern
Orthodoxy). That sacrament is an entry and window into the life of God, and
it is the
