Alan (if I may),
I am not sure exactly what you want; but the interaction between the European
Convention of Human Rights (Strasbourg) and the EU Charter of Fundamental
Rights (Luxembourg) is one of the most challenging fields of European law.
The Convention has a wide ranging scope;
Eugene,
My email keeps bouncing;
From: Paul Diamond [mailto:pauldiam...@btconnect.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 15:08
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Discrimination against people with religious motivations for
their actions
With great hesitation, I enter
not implement the Chamber decision, a reversal was expected by the
Grand Chamber. Non implementation by a Contracting State would have
significant political ramifications.
Paul
Paul Diamond, barrister
PO Box 1041 Barton
Cambridge CB23 7WY
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 1223 264544
:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/1357.html
Paul Diamond, barrister
Chambers of Paul Diamond
PO Box 1041 Barton
Cambridge CB23 7WY
T: 01223 264544
www.pauldiamond.com
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf
and iii) Parliament has outlawed it.
f.. This case makes a number of silly errors such as the confusion between
religious beliefs and manifestation.
Sorry to bore you all and have a great Christmas, or holidays.
Paul
Paul Diamond
Chambers of Paul Diamond
PO Box 1041 Barton
Cambridge CB23 7WY United
systems based on
religious beliefs is incompatible with the rule of law.
Paul
Paul Diamond
Chambers of Paul Diamond
PO Box 1041 Barton
Cambridge CB23 7WY United Kingdom
01223 264544
www.pauldiamond.com
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Laycock
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
is available. A
mutual duty to protect/ respect each other rights.
I have been immensely benefited in my discussion with Canadian attorney,
Iain Benson (credit where credit is due).
Paul Diamond, barrister
- Original Message -
From: Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Law Religion issues
to go to Hell and be told about
it
Paul Diamond, barrister.
- Original Message -
From: Esenberg, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 4:38 AM
Subject: RE: LOFTON / Re
I would be very interested to know the meaning of 'compelling interest' and
'substantive burden';
In Europe, the approach to fundamental rights is that the right would be
vitiated if a private employer could avoid accommodation by pleading 'de
minimus cost' and the courts engage in a
Just to say that I had the 'pleasure' of attending the lecture of the
Archbishop at the Royal Court of Justice. Without going into too much detail
of the talk (which raised issues of court intrusion into the nature of
religious belief), the talk was calculated and deliberately provocative.
Leaving aside arguments on 'mandated speech'; I am interested whether folks
think there is a particular right of 'conscience' (within the Constitution)
as a distinct ground for accommodation and how far this would extend in
employment or public service.
Paul.
- Original Message -
) their rights. What is the interest of the State in
denying such a request?
Paul Diamond, barrister.
- Original Message -
From: Vance R. Koven
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: InnerChange Litigation
FYI
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link
attachments:Shortcut to: http://195.224.230.11/english/?id=16877Note:
To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or
receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security
I would like to see a copy of this judgment.
- Original Message -
From:
Douglas
Laycock
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 12:20
AM
Subject: InnerChange decision
I don't have a link, and I don't want to clog all your
Every blessing in your courageous fight from the UK. We have similar
problems in the UK;
The Times Lawyer of the Week http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-1904318,00.html
. Paul
- Original Message -
From:
Gordon
James Klingenschmitt
To: UCLA Law Class
Sent:
US article.
Lesbian Fertility Patient Loses To Religious Beliefs ...
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
A pattern is developing; there are now three major cases in Europe: one in
The Netherlands, 'Hammond' in the United Kingdom and 'Green' in Sweden.
The pattern is thus:-
1. This law is introduced as necessary to protect 'selected' groups from
phobic 'gangs' and there are effective legal
not sure the links are coming through; I will try again.
http://www.eauk.org/CONTENTMANAGER/Content/PoliticsandSociety/PQandBriefings/PQ04-02/secularintolerance.cfm
and http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2004/69.html
- Original Message -
From: Paul Diamond [EMAIL PROTECTED
to the
private school.
Paul Diamond, Cambridge UK.
- Original Message -
From:
Vance R. Koven
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 1:16
PM
Subject: Re: Sex Ed and Jewish schools in
Belgium
Moral: who lives by the subsidy, dies
@lists.ucla.edu
Cc: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: UK case
At 10:10 PM 8/2/2005 +0100, Paul Diamond wrote:
It works! A seven day shift is simply a seven day working pattern; we
have
working hour limitation
a need he is reasonable!
Paul Diamond
- Original Message -
From:
Vance R. Koven
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:56
PM
Subject: Re: UK case
I find it difficult to figure out what principle to adduce from
this case
- Original Message -
From: Paul
Diamond
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Good News From Across the Big Pond
If I may be so bold as to give a perspective from the United Kingdom.
The case of SB is extremely poorly argued and
per incuriam
Message from UK- are you guys aware of the decision in this case- very long
from a Tribunal (not court) in Victoria, Australia on vilification of
religion.
It is attached below and at
http://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/decisions/
ul Diamond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Paul Diamond; I am a British barrister who works in the
field of religious rights in the UK/Europe. I am affliliated with a
Cambridge College.
I am very (legally) alone in the UK and would appreciate
corr
My name is Paul Diamond; I am a British barrister who works in the field of
religious rights in the UK/Europe. I am affliliated with a Cambridge
College.
I am very (legally) alone in the UK and would appreciate
correspondence.
I have two issues at present (which I can expand upon):
1
25 matches
Mail list logo
