What's interesting about the Az bill is that it does not facially target same
sex couples - it seems to just extend the state RFRA to disputes among private
parties. I don't think Romer would really apply. On the other hand, it's not
clear that it would accomplish what its proponents want.
There is a huge difference between the Church's teaching on contraception
(which is clear), and its views on the permissibility of participating in an
insurance scheme that covers contraception for employees who would likely
already purchase it using their paychecks, let alone the
I agree with Rick on both points. (FWIW, in her book on Catholic teaching in
contraception, I believe Leslie Tentler identified 5-6 kids as the more
standard size for CathoIic families who followed Church teaching.) But I think
the issue becomes even more complicated once you move beyond
Thanks, Rick -- For me, the problem with the ND claim is precisely the
opposite. If the beliefs of the group were more unfamiliar, I'd be less
puzzled and more likely to defer to the group's own description of the burden.
As a Catholic, I feel more entitled to probe, and as a consequence I
Not how this is being reported, but I agree.
On Jan 24, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Marci Hamilton
hamilto...@aol.commailto:hamilto...@aol.com wrote:
It looks like the Court told them to do what they said they didn't want to do.
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo
And then there's Florida:
A nearly 6-foot-tall
Festivushttp://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/arts-culture/holidays/festivus-EVFES1076.topic
pole made from empty beer cans will be put up in the Florida Capitol this week
as a not-so-subtle protest to the recent placement of a Christmas
that they think is wrong (or maybe that they think is
just too far wrong).
Eugene
From:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Penalver, Eduardo
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:05 PM
wrong).
Eugene
From:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Penalver, Eduardo
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:05 PM
To: Law Religion issues
).
Eduardo M. Peñalver
John P. Wilson Professor of Law
University of Chicago Law School
E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
penal...@uchicago.edu
(773) 702-3959 (phone)
(773) 702-0730 (fax)
From: Penalver, Eduardo penal...@uchicago.edumailto:penal...@uchicago.edu
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law
of restriction (mandating photos
irrespective of views on war) would meet the same analysis.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Penalver, Eduardo
penal...@uchicago.edumailto:penal...@uchicago.edu wrote:
From the majority opinion:
The Barnette Court noted that the dissenting students’ choice not to salute
Next up, a lawsuit demanding to be paid in currency that can't be used to buy
contraception.
Eduardo
From: Friedman, Howard M.
howard.fried...@utoledo.edumailto:howard.fried...@utoledo.edu
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
I'm relatively new to this list, but can you possibly believe this?:
The morality of homosexual relationships can only be maintained by someone who
is unaware of - or ignores - the arguments that are actually made.
On Jun 30, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Esenberg, Richard
12 matches
Mail list logo
