Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Jamar
-Original Message- From: Lupu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:50 AM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: 21st Century Zorach Released time has several problems in addition to trapping the left- behind students in a dead hour (Rick, high

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Jamar
What happened to Sunday School? Parents don't bring their kids there so they churches want the captive audience. When I was a kid we had Wednesday School -- Wed. morning release time -- with about double the attendance as at Sunday School -- even worse ratio during hunting season, of course.

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Jamar
If the state sponsored chess or other meaningful activity during the release time, then there would be parents complaining about discrimination because their students who were released for religious training are missing out on some instruction. If the state continued classroom instruction, then

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-19 Thread JMHACLJ
Everything Michael Newsome says could be true. But why the persistent failure to account for the overwhelming competitive advantage obtained through the 1-2 punch of compulsory attendance (not compulsory learning or compulsory education, we should note) and confiscatory taxation, without

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-19 Thread JMHACLJ
There was a time -- say, 1776 or so -- when there was widespread agreement that education was a virtue of itself. Yes, as in Thomas Jefferson's plan for public education in Virginia. A plan that placed the burden of funding education on the public, the education of every child, all the way

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-19 Thread RJLipkin
In a message dated 2/18/2005 11:42:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A theistic democrat could believe that human beings are made in the image and likeness of God, and that they deserve to be loved because of this and in specific cases are loved because God is

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-19 Thread Steven Shiffrin
And I will end by saying that the non-theists in one sense are right about lack of intelligibility (most theists do not really claim to understand what God is, thus the term mystery); so one person's lack of intelligibility is another person's mystery. Yes, the problem of suffering is real,

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Rick Duncan
It seems to me that if there is a problem with modern released time programs, the problem is not with the releasing of students whose parents request a release, but rather in not providing something to do for the kids whose parents don't wish them to be released. I don't know the facts of the

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Rick Duncan
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Duncan Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:19 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: 21st Century Zorach It seems to me that if there is a problem with modern released time programs, the problem is not with the releasing of students

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread A.E. Brownstein
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Duncan Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:19 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: 21st Century Zorach It seems to me that if there is a problem with modern released time programs, the problem is not with the releasing of students whose

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Lupu
: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:13:30 -0800 (PST) From: Rick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject:RE: 21st Century Zorach Send reply to: Law Religion issues for Law

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread JMHACLJ
In a message dated 2/18/2005 1:30:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In addition to Marty and Marc's point about the lack of constructive programs for students who do not participate, isn't there also a problem with release time programs that are limited exclusively to

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Marty Lederman
ase that McConnell conceded would be unconstitutional. - Original Message - From: "Lupu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Law Religion issues for Law Academics" religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:49 PM Subject: RE: 21st Century Zorach Released tim

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Ed Brayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there something to be said for accommodation? Here comes big old bully State, grabs parents by the lapels, and threatens life, liberty and property unless child is put in a school setting from age 5 to as late as age 20, for as many as 7 to 8 hours a

21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Steven Green
Alan is correct about the need for non-religious alternatives. Good News was premised, in part, on the fact that the immediately after-school time was available to a host of groups (though no other group had exercised that right). As Doug recommended, release time should occur after the

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Marty Lederman
;lack[s]skills necessary to do so." - Original Message - From: "Scarberry, Mark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'" religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:06 PM Subject: RE: 21st Century Zorach A possible a

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Lupu
Accommodation is only a legitimate argument or concern if the state is creating a burden on religious freedom. But there is no conflict between compulsory education and religious education, because there are ample days and hours in which parents are free to educate their children in the ways

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread JMHACLJ
Ed, would you reconsider the form of your question. I support toleration and accommodation of religious needs of students penned in the government schools/corrals. In the Islamic context, I have publicly expressed the view that schools should accommodate students' percieved need for time to stop

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Rick Duncan
I would be very receptive to an argument, under the Free Speech Clause and the principle of equal access, that dissenting parents should have the right to demand that their children be released to take part in any type of released time program, whether religious or secular. The solution to the

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Ed Brayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed, would you reconsider the form of your question. I support toleration and accommodation of religious needs of students penned in the government schools/corrals. In the Islamic context, I have publicly expressed the view that schools should accommodate

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread RJLipkin
In a message dated 2/18/2005 2:51:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If it is a constitutionally permissible policy judgment by government actors to take into accountthe religious needs of the people, then as long as accommodation is made for all religious

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Scarberry, Mark
Subject: Re: 21st Century Zorach A small clarification: The Constitution does not, as such, prohibit the teaching in publicschools of most values that are central to, and derived from,religion.See, e.g., Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. at 612-13, 621. What it prohibits arespecifically religious

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Rick Duncan
Century Zorach A small clarification: The Constitution does not, as such, prohibit the teaching in public schools of most values that are central to, and derived from, religion. See, e.g., Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. at 612-13, 621. What it prohibits are specifically religious

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Lupu
it.) Mark S. Scarberry Pepperdine University School of Law -Original Message- From: Marty Lederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:38 AM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: 21st Century Zorach

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Lupu
for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject:Re: 21st Century Zorach Send reply to: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu mailto:religionlaw- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:religionlaw- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Suppose instead

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Newsom Michael
political agenda that finds favor with a majority of the Court. Each takes care of the other in its own fashion. -Original Message- From: Steven Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:26 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: 21st Century Zorach

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread FRAP428
Yes, it does seem a bit ridiculous to have released time chess club or swimming lessons as opposed to 4 p.m. Thursday afternoon chess club or swimming lessons and likewise for sectarian out-of-school activities. Frances R. A. Paterson, J.D., Ed.D. Associate Professor Department of Educational

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Newsom Michael
PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: 21st Century Zorach Accommodation is only a legitimate argument or concern if the state is creating a burden on religious freedom. But there is no conflict between compulsory education and religious education, because there are ample

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Berg, Thomas C.
Academics Subject: Re: 21st Century Zorach Accommodation is only a legitimate argument or concern if the state is creating a burden on religious freedom. But there is no conflict between compulsory education and religious education, because there are ample days and hours in which parents

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Rick Duncan
I, of course, agree with Tom that true school choice is the real solution to the culture wars being fought in government schools. Only school choice affirms religious liberty, freedon of thought and belief, and tolerance for all children. And only it avoids all captive audience issues. But I

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread RJLipkin
In a message dated 2/18/2005 3:19:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: loving others because of God's love for you and because God loves them as well, etc. I find Mark's remark to be committed to an instrumental love of others, a love deriving from the relationship

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Ed Darrell
There was a time -- say, 1776 or so -- when there was widespread agreement that education was a virtue of itself. There is probably still widespread agreement that literature, math, geography and history are useful, and there's no inherent reason kids who don't participate in released-time

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-18 Thread Steven Shiffrin
Mark's perspective is not the only theistic perspective. A theistic democrat could believe that human beings are made in the image and likeness of God, and that they deserve to be loved because of this and in specific cases are loved because God is seen in them, i.e., as a part of their

RE: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-17 Thread Douglas Laycock
ean Keeton St. Austin, TX 78705 512-232-1341 (phone) 512-471-6988 (fax) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty LedermanSent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:09 PMTo: Law Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: 21st Century Zorach Dahlia Lithwick in Slate

21st Century Zorach

2005-02-16 Thread Marty Lederman
Dahlia Lithwick in Slate on current released-time programs in Virginia and elsewhere: http://slate.msn.com/id/2113611/. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently upheld a New York released time program, on the authority of Zorach, even though the children remaining in the

Re: 21st Century Zorach

2005-02-16 Thread Ed Darrell
Especially under the state regulations supporting the No Child Left Behind Act, any program that leaves kids twiddling thumbs instead of taking AP biology is probably suspect, and perhaps illegal. When I attended schools in Utah, which had probably the most extensive released time programs, the