for the note,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:religionlaw-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cruz
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:01 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Dent Link Again
Dear Mr. Sanders:
Thank you for calling Dent out
I don't know why the link isn't working. Here is one more attempt:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=931257Civil Rights for Whom?: Gay Rights versus Religious Freedom Rick Rick Duncan Welpton Professor of Law University of Nebraska College of Law Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rick Duncan
Sent: Wed 10/25/2006 8:28 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Dent Link Again
I don't know why the link isn't working. Here is one more attempt:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=931257Civil Rights for
Whom?: Gay Rights
Two pages into this obviously tendentious piece of research, one
spots a tellingly flawed premise: The goal of the gay movement are
[sic] not primarily economic; most gays already have above-average
incomes.
The cite for this old canard is a 12-year-old article in the Notre Dame
Law Review.
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Dent Link Again
Two pages into this obviously tendentious piece of research, one
spots a tellingly flawed premise: The goal of the gay movement are
[sic] not primarily economic; most gays already have above-average
incomes.
The cite for this old canard is a 12
