: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:14 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: More Discrimination Against Wiccans
Yes, the cases are different, and perhaps the Indiana case raises even
more constitutional problems than the Virginia case. (Eugene lists five
distinct constitutional clauses
If, as Justice O'Connor believed, the funding of
Wide Awake would occur "in a context that makes
improbable any perception of government endorsement of the religious message,"
isn't that even more obviously true in Ms. Simpson's case?
- Original Message -
From: "Volokh,
I'm engaged in a bit of a debate with a young attorney who is defending
Judge Bradford in this case. His argument is that Prince v.
Massachusetts and Wisconsin v. Yoder both established that the
government may limit the rights of parents to protect the health and
well-being of the child. I
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: More Discrimination Against Wiccans
I'm engaged in a bit of a debate with a young attorney who is defending
Judge Bradford in this case. His argument is that Prince v.
Massachusetts and Wisconsin v. Yoder both established that the
government
)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Marc Stern
Sent: Fri 5/27/2005 9:51 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: More Discrimination Against Wiccans
There is an ALR 3 or 4 annotation collecting child custody case where
religion is at issue. All, or almost all
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: [BULK] RE: More Discrimination Against Wiccans
Importance: Low
The cases are something of a mix; I touch on them at
http://www1.law.ucla.edu/~volokh/custody.pdf (see especially n.32
pp.36-38). Most demand some evidence of likely harm
According to this article (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481),an Indiana judge has prohibited a pair of divorced
parents from exposing their 9-year-old son to Wiccan beliefs and rituals.
Both parentspractice Wicca, and both strongly oppose the
Marty Lederman wrote:
According to this article (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481),an Indiana judge has prohibited a pair of
divorced parents from exposing their 9-year-old son to Wiccan beliefs
and rituals. Both parentspractice Wicca,
Subject: Re: More Discrimination Against
Wiccans
Marty Lederman wrote:
According to this article (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481),an Indiana judge has prohibited a pair of divorced
parents from exposing their 9-year-old son
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:33
AMTo: religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduSubject: Re: More
Discrimination Against Wiccans
Isn't it fairly obvious what this judge and the domestic relations person
were thinking? They were thinking that this is a "Christian&qu
: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:46
AM
Subject: RE: More Discrimination Against
Wiccans
Aren't these
cases rather different? The Indiana case involves a judicial intrusion
into the private religious decisionmaking of parents (in the abs
11 matches
Mail list logo
