The state's pervasive discrimination against same-sex relationships makes
mincemeat of its claim that it has a compelling interest in prohibiting all
private discrimination against same-sex relationships.
Quoting Volokh, Eugene vol...@law.ucla.edu:
-Original Message-
From: Ira
[mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Steven Jamar
*Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:38 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photography
true. but why is compelling state interest the standard here?
I don't
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photography
What if it were not a wedding ceremony (legally recognized or not)? But a
Valentine's Day
