...@lists.ucla.edu
[religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
[aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 5:06 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I agree
...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Rassbach
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:09 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan --
Does your analysis below apply
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 8:54 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I always assumed, although I admit without much reflection, that the duty to
accommodate operated in parallel to the duty
Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan --
Does your analysis below apply equally to religious organizations
and non-religious organizations?
One example I think would be interesting in the latter category is
In-N-Out Burger, which
...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:01 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I do not think a for profit fast food employer
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
[aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:26 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
As always, Eugene asks good questions.
Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- disparate
treatment, failure to accommodate, and in addition harassment and
disparate impact.
I am
Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:12 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
As always, Eugene asks good questions.
Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- disparate
treatment
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
As always, Eugene asks good questions.
Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- disparate
treatment, failure to accommodate, and in addition harassment and
disparate impact.
I am
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
As always, Eugene asks good questions.
Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- disparate
treatment, failure to accommodate, and in addition harassment and
disparate impact
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:47 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan's examples of uniform language expressing racial discrimination or
hostility seem
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I agree with Michael for the most part and certainly with his statement that
expressions of religious faith are not analogous to expressions of racial
subordination. But I'm not sure if he is suggesting
...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Do you think there is a discrimination issue
: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I take
it that the claim is that requiring everyone to display something would
constitute discrimination (not just failure to accommodate religious
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I take
it that the claim is that requiring everyone to display something would
constitute discrimination (not just failure
apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I
take it that the claim is that requiring everyone to display something would
constitute discrimination (not just failure to accommodate religious beliefs
: Monday, December 20, 2010 10:33 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory
more? I take it that the claim is that requiring everyone
...@law.ucla.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 10:33 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I
take it that the claim
Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:52 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics; Eric Rassbach
Subject: Re: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
It doesn't make sense to call religious truth claims offensive (although that
is common parlance
for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take
downreligioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory
more? I take it that the claim is that requiring everyone to
display something would constitute discrimination
...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan [aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:26 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I think Doug is correct that there is a religious
This story from the Oklahoma City newspaper indicates that the Federal
Reserve has changed its position about the bank and the items in question.
http://newsok.com/feds-relent-on-oklahoma-banks-display-of-christian-themed-
items/article/3524584?custom_click=headlines_widget
Kevin Pybas
regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
This story from the Oklahoma City newspaper indicates that the Federal Reserve
has changed its position about the bank and the items in question.
http://newsok.com/feds-relent-on-oklahoma-banks-display-of-christian-themed-items
: Friday, December 17, 2010 3:31 PM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
This story from the Oklahoma City newspaper indicates that the Federal Reserve
has changed its position about the bank and the items
employers.)
Eugene
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:10 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Very interesting, thanks! But I'm a bit confused by the Kansas
City Fed chairman's statement,
http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/newsroom/2010pdf
26 matches
Mail list logo
