I appreciate Mark's arguments, and I'd be glad to be persuaded
to his position. Yet they still make me uneasy given that analogs of
them could be used equally in lots of other subsidize our exercise of
our constitutional rights cases.
The Due Process Clause has been read, rightly
Well, I was using the secular law definition of discrimination,
which (at least insofar as it's relevant here) is pretty much Stevens's
test in Manhart: Does the institution treat[] a person in a manner
which but for that person's sex would be different? If Jesus Christ
deliberately
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:23 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: State RFRA and nonreligious
groupsthathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws
Well
