I think I need to include Lemon, Hardison, Reynolds, and Pierce, but then again, I was a history major as an undergrad. :)But then what to displace?I fear I followed Chip's example here and tossed it.Nonetheless, I do want to note a caveat to my general sense that the information from such an
Here is real trivia. What about Pernoli, the 1850ish case holding taht
the federal government was not obligated to obey the first amendment.
Mark A. Graber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/13/06 1:03 PM
Here is a potential source of endless pointless debate. Two professors
are working on a
Permoli is interesting for the politics of New Orleans but otherwise it is a
reaffirmation of Barron, that the BoR does not apply to the states.
Paul Finkelman
Quoting Mark Graber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is real trivia. What about Pernoli, the 1850ish case
holding taht
the federal
Doug is a more responsible academic than I am. When I got that
request to rank the top 20 cases in my field, and I started to reflect on
the exercise, I reached the same conclusion as Doug (that any such
list was hopelessly arbitrary, and taken by itself, quite meaningless),
and I threw away
A fine list, to be sure, Doug. But there are a couple of very conspicuous omissions that I'm sure were intentional and as to which I'd love to know your reasoning.
The most important category, of course, is the "direct funding" cases, from Lemon (or even Allen) through Mitchell v. Helms,
for Law Academics;
religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduCc: Douglas LaycockSubject: Re:
Trivial Pursuit
A fine list, to be sure, Doug. But there are a couple of very
conspicuous omissions that I'm sure were intentional and as to which I'd love to
know your reasoning.
The most important category, of course
Subject: Re: Trivial Pursuit
A fine list, to be sure, Doug. But there are a couple of very
conspicuous omissions that I'm sure were intentional and as to
which I'd love to know your reasoning.
The most important category, of course, is the direct
funding cases, from Lemon (or even Allen
LaycockSubject: Re: Trivial Pursuit
A fine list, to be sure, Doug. But there are a couple of very conspicuous omissions that I'm sure were intentional and as to which I'd love to know your reasoning.
The most important category, of course, is the "direct funding" cases, from Lemon (or
:
Prof. Douglas Laycock
University of Michigan Law School
625 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Christopher C. Lund
Sent: Sun 8/13/2006 6:48 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trivial Pursuit
I'm a little
