RE: The Merits in Newdow

2004-06-14 Thread marc stern
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1:36 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics; David Cruz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The Merits in Newdow Justice Thomas, by the way, would also hold that the Fourteenth Amendment does not incorporate the Establishment Clause: Quite simply

Re: The Merits in Newdow

2004-06-14 Thread Marty Lederman
: Marty Lederman To: David Cruz ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Law Religion issues for Law Academics Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:56 AM Subject: The Merits in Newdow The collection of concurrences on the merits are quite interesting. The Chief's opinion adopts the SG's argument --

Re: The Merits in Newdow

2004-06-14 Thread Marty Lederman
s' Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:41 PM Subject: RE: The Merits in Newdow Why? It is Virginia that has set up an establishment clause defense to the federal act. The Act itself purports to protect Free Exercise rights and Thomas does not contend these are not incorporated .And

Re: The Merits in Newdow

2004-06-14 Thread Ann Althouse
Stevens creates a new prudential limitation on standing: it is improper for the federal courts to entertain a claim by a plaintiff whose standing to sue is founded on family law rights that are in dispute when prosecution of the lawsuit may have an adverse effect on the person who is the source of