most important recent decisions

2006-02-14 Thread Paul Finkelman
I am trying to get a sense of what the most important recent US Sup. Ct. decisions are for the past 4 terms 02-03 03-04 04-05 and as they come in 05-06 I am trying to identify the 8-10 (more or less) most important decisions of each term. Off list responses would be find, but it might make an

RE: most important recent decisions

2006-02-14 Thread Corcos, Christine
Kelo v. City of New London (2005)? Christine Corcos Associate Professor of Law Faculty Graduate Studies Program Supervisor Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University Associate Professor, Women's and Gender Studies Program LSU AM W325 Law Building 1 East Campus Drive Baton Rouge LA

RE: most important recent decisions

2006-02-14 Thread Stanley M. Shepp
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) Full case name: John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner v. Texas Citations: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S. Ct. 2472; 156 L. Ed. 2d 508; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 5013; 71 U.S.L.W. 4574; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5559; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7036;

Re: most important recent decisions

2006-02-14 Thread robson
Paul: Excluding Lawrence Grutter as from the 2002 term, my picks for important cases would be: Ashcroft v ACLU Hamdi Tennessee v. Lane Locke v. Davey Kelo Castle Rock Roper v. Simons Gonzalez v. Oregon and when decided, I'd probably put Rumsfeld v. FAIR on the list. Ruthann Ruthann

ACLU of Ohio Demands Schools Stop Teaching Intelligent Design as Science

2006-02-14 Thread AAsch
Excerpt of 2/14/2006 press release: TOLEDO, OH -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio today sent a letter to the Toledo Public Schools demanding that they cease allowing staff to teach intelligent design in science classrooms throughout the district. "Intelligent design has been