No, it really isnt nonsense. Anti-gay
violence exists on a far larger scale than you are prepared to admit. Sorry.
From: Brad M Pardee
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 11:55
AM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Catholic Charities
I am not sure there is a real conflict here. Let us suppose for
arguments sake that 50 million Americans believe that sexual intimacy
ought to be reserved for heterosexual marriage. Let us further suppose
that only 50 thousand of these citizens believe this precept should be
enforced by
Actually, it might follow that religions are entitled to benefits
without certain strings attached. To suggest that religions are not is
to beg the question.
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:42 AM
To: Law Religion issues
NLRB v. Catholic Bishop speaks extensively about how government
supervision of the relationship between religious schools and their
teachers can create Establishment Clause concerns. The Court ultimately
holds that the NLRA doesn't apply to the schools, and doesn't decide
that such an
I appreciate Mark's arguments, and I'd be glad to be persuaded
to his position. Yet they still make me uneasy given that analogs of
them could be used equally in lots of other subsidize our exercise of
our constitutional rights cases.
The Due Process Clause has been read, rightly
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:20 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Catholic Charities Issue
Hmm; is there any data that would support this assertion? (I
take it that the assertion is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Newsom Michael
Sent: Mon 3/20/2006 3:36 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Catholic Charities Issue
Could you give some examples of gay rights proponents who ignore religious
liberty interests?
