Richard Schragger
University of Virginia School of Law
Charlottesville, VA 22903
tel: (434) 924-3641
fax: (434) 982-2845
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:53 AM 6/15/2004 -0400, Mark Graber wrote:
Might this be a relevant constitutional point, though not a point of
constitutional law.
The president plays many different roles. Sometimes more partisan roles
are appropriate. So there is nothing unpresidential about a post 1896
president urging Americans to elect Republicans to Congress (but see
Tulis, THE RHETORICAL PRESIDENT, suggesting a constitutional norm in the
nineteenth century against such behavior). Other times, the president
is clearly the representative of the entire nation. So campaign
rhetoric would have been inappropriate at Reagan's funeral.
Strikes me that when the President confers with the Pope, representative
of the entire nation is the appropriate hat. Urging the Pope to fight
terrorism is not problemmatic, because that is a non-partisan issue in
the United States. Urging the Pope to speak out more clear against gay
marriage or capital punishment is more problematic.
Is there anything to this admitted intuition.
MAG
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw