Paul Finkelman wrote:
it is hard to imagine how tying a minor child down can be anything but a
tort.
Well, for starters, it could be a crime.
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25423465/
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to
Paul R Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University
--Original Message--
From: Joel Sogol
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Religionlaw
ReplyTo: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Jun 28, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: Court: Exorcism is protected by law - Faith
AM
Subject: Court: Exorcism is protected by law - Faith- msnbc.com
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25423465/
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin
Yeshiva University
--Original Message--
From: Joel Sogol
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Religionlaw
ReplyTo: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Jun 28, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: Court: Exorcism is protected by law - Faith- msnbc.com
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25423465
On Jun 28, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Paul Finkelman wrote:
it is hard to imagine how tying a minor child down can be anything
but a tort. Professor Lund seems to imply there is a religious
exception to normal tort law for tying up and abusing children.
what might that be?
Not to speak for
--
From: Christopher Lund
Sender:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Jun 28, 2008 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: Court: Exorcism is protected by law - Faith- msnbc.com
I read the opinions -- there are several different views in the
dissents. How do you think these cases should
:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Jun 28, 2008 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: Court: Exorcism is protected by law - Faith- msnbc.com
I read the opinions -- there are several different views in the
dissents. How do you think these cases should be decided? Can she
recover for just
