Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-11 Thread Hamilton02
While it is possible that pretext may play a role as Doug describes it, there is no reason to conclude that pretext is automatically proven by a requirement of enough parking for Orthodox Jews if most members walk on the Sabbath. In this day and age, uses are rarely limited to the 24

Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-10 Thread Hamilton02
This is not completely accurate. Many Orthodox Jewish congregations have a number of members who drive and arrive right before sunset and leave their cars for 24 hours. There is no religious rule against that. That means their parking issues can be worse than others. I actually

Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-10 Thread Douglas Laycock
In the absence of evidence that significant numbers in a local congregation were doing what Marci describes (driving in before sundset and parking for the entire Sabbath), the reliance on parking regs would be pretextual.  See Orthodox Minyan v. Cheltenham Twp. Zoning Board, 552 A.2d 772 (Pa.

RE: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-10 Thread Ed Brayton
] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:17 AM To: Paul Finkelman Cc: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit In the absence of evidence that significant numbers in a local congregation were doing what Marci describes (driving in before sundset

Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-10 Thread Paul Finkelman
thanks Doug. Now it makes perfect sense. Paul Paul Finkelman President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy Albany Law School 80 New Scotland Avenue Albany, New York 12208-3494 518-445-3386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Douglas Laycock [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/10/07

RE: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-10 Thread Douglas Laycock
: Michigan RLUIPA suit In the absence of evidence that significant numbers in a local congregation were doing what Marci describes (driving in before sundset and parking for the entire Sabbath), the reliance on parking regs would be pretextual.  See Orthodox Minyan v. Cheltenham Twp. Zoning Board

Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-09 Thread Ed Brayton
http://www.journalgroup.com/Northville/6343/lawsuit-accuses-township-of- religious-harassment The Thomas More Law Center is filing suit against a Michigan municipality for demanding that a religious order apply for a zoning variance because of all the cars parked at and around their facility.

Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-09 Thread Douglas Laycock
  Where are they parked?  Around the building on their own property? Or around the property on public streets that must be shared with others?   Reasonable parking regs generally prevail, as Ed says. But there are also cases where parking regs are plainly being used to get rid of somebody --

Re: Michigan RLUIPA suit

2007-11-09 Thread Paul Finkelman
I am sure it must because it is late at night and I have been traveling all day, and so I am fogged in, but I can't quite figure out how a parking regulation would be used against Orthodox Jews wanting to build in the neighborhood since, as Doug points out, they don't drive to services. I hope