]
Sent: Wed 6/9/2004 4:56 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
Sorry to be late in responding to Tom's post, but I was out of town.
On the first point, Tom and I share very different intuitions. If we are
basing claims
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 10:22
AM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Gay Activists
Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
I was making
only Marty's point (ii). As to his point (i), If the church wants to buy
media
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
Thanks, Tom. Your post and Doug's are helpful (at least to me). I think you
are both right that a religious leader technically on the payroll of a
(c)(4) organization who delivered regular partisan
or
constitutional analysis? -- from the partisan political speech of her
nonreligious counterpart?
- Original Message -
From: Douglas
Laycock
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt
Status
I agree
:10 PM
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt
Status
I agree that the absolute
limit on candidate advocacy is a problem. Of course it is a problem
for all other non-profits as well, and the usual solution is to set up a
political affiliate. The one other way in which churches
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
I'm not sure I fully understand this argument, but I don't know all that
much about church doctrine or tax law. Can you help me, Tom. Is the
argument that the religious leaders of certain faith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: A.E. Brownstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:44 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
I'm not sure I fully understand
Title: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is nothing to the threat. Churches
are free to take stands on political issues provided they do not spend a substantial
amount on these activities. The late Dean Kelly obtained an internal IRS memo which
indicted that
igion issues for Law
Academics'
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44
AM
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten
Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is
nothing to the threat. Churches are free to take stands on political issues
provided they do not spend a substantial amount
ful threat.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of marc
sternSent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44 AMTo: 'Law
Religion issues for Law Academics'Subject: RE: Gay Activists
Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is
nothing to
.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44
AM
To: 'Law
Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Gay Activists
Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is nothing to the threat.
Churches are free
: Thursday, June 03, 2004
10:31 AM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Gay Activists
Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
How about: This moral
principle [pick from among the usual suspects] is so important to this
religious congregation that, if a congregantsupports any
represent a
meaningful threat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt
Status
There really is nothing
case, one way or the other?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:20 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
The IRS has spoken reasonably
: Marty Lederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 6/3/2004 9:08 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
This appears to be the hot-button issue of the day, what with today's New
York Times front-page story about Bush's attempt
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is nothing to the threat. Churches are free to take stands
on political issues
PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc stern
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
There really is nothing to the threat. Churches are free to take stands
on political issues provided they do not spend
that?
Tom Berg
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)
_
From: Marty Lederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 6/3/2004 9:08 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Gay Activists Threaten Church Tax-Exempt Status
This appears to be the hot-button issue
- Original Message -
From:
Douglas Laycock
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 12:10
PM
Subject: RE: Gay Activists Threaten
Church Tax-Exempt Status
I agree
that the absolute limit on candidate advocacy is a problem. Of course it
is
19 matches
Mail list logo
