If you haven't read the complaint in the Association of Christian Schools v. UC case, I encourage you to do so. Although UC denied approval to courses concerning "Christianity's Influence on American History" and "Christianity and Morality in American Literature" as being too narrow and not
Dear Rick:
I would assume that UC has equivalent courses such as History of
Christianity; Renaissance/Reformation and a number of early modern
European courses and late antiquity courses that deal almost entirely
with the Church and Church history. There are probably courses on the
Bible
I am sure Paul would love to teach the course on Christianity hedescribes below. I am sure it would be very interesting. And if he taught it in a California high school, UC might well have approved it.
Indeed, it seems that it was the viewpoint of the course, not its subject matter, that was the
You can conclude the course with the lecture, Why the moral relativism
embraced by secularism can't adequately account for the wrongness of the
acts I just condemned.
Time for Eugene to spank us.
Frank
On 9/6/05 1:24 PM, Paul Finkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The KKK (and the use of the
My point Rick,is that the course Influence of Christianity in US
History would need to be a serious course, that looked at issues with
some skepticism and not merely propaganda; if my coursre were set out as
I did, without other things, it would hardly work as a serious course.
In the US we
issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: UC Case: Facts from Complaint
Francis Beckwith wrote:
You can conclude the course with the lecture, Why the moral
relativism
embraced by secularism can't adequately account for the wrongness of
the acts I just condemned.
Time for Eugene to spank
Title: Re: UC Case: Facts from Complaint
Bobby, I dont disagree with you. All I was saying is that secular relativism cannot account for the wrongs. I did not say that secularism is relativistic per se. What I was thinking of was the stuff written by Stephen Gey in which he says
At 02:11 PM 9/6/05 -0500, you wrote:
My point Rick,is that the course Influence of Christianity in US History
would need to be a serious course, that looked at issues with some
skepticism and not merely propaganda; if my coursre were set out as I did,
without other things, it would hardly
