Eugene
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces@li
>> sts.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ira Lupu
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:19 AM
>> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.uc
un...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces@
> lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ira Lupu
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:19 AM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
> *Subject:* Re: State-sanctioned church "police force
There is a North Carolina case a few years ago challenging the campus police
forces of religiously affiliated universities as an Establishment Clause
violation. The NC courts upheld the police forces. That looked more like equal
treatment; this looks more like a special deal.
Douglas Laycock
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
on behalf of Ira Lupu <icl...@law.gwu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:19 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: State-sanctioned church "police forc
ubject: Re: State-sanctioned church "police force"
Why would a large, predominantly white suburban congregation near Birmingham
need its own police force?
For a related religion clause case, see State v. Celmer,
http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1979/80-n-j-405-0
Why would a large, predominantly white suburban congregation near
Birmingham need its own police force?
For a related religion clause case, see State v. Celmer,
http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1979/80-n-j-405-0.html
(invalidating on First A grounds "a statutory scheme which
