Not being familiar with the NFCC Voting system ... I'm looking for
enlightenment.
(Snip)
Under the NFCC's proportional voting system, 93 votes were cast in favor
of
the motion by 19 members, and 54 against by 11 members.
(Snip)
Please explain ... 147 votes by 30 people..?? (Sounds like a
It depends on your coverage area and the lay of the land. If you've got
hills and users in close with HT's, you might want to consider a lower gain
antenna.
My first choice is the DB-408. Half the length and wind load/weight of the
DB420 and it's much easier on your wallet. The 420 puts all
Hello Group,
I just picked up 2 Mastr II VHF Stations minus the power supplies.
When I connect the big Red and Black power leads to the PA to 13.8
volts, no power reaches the rest of the station. The schematic in the
manual shows a cable from the power supply going to the backplane or
There will be 4 connectors on the back plane of the control shelf. Just
behind the 10volt regulator card. Off those 4 connections is the wire
harness going to the exciter and receiver and should be 2 red and black
wires larger than most in the loom, those are the ones that go to the power
supply.
Chris Rosing wrote:
Ok, For someone who isnt that much into the rules and regsthat
would seem like a duh statement. Why is this such a big deal? To
me, a repeater repeats the signal, hince a repeater. Looking at it,
I am seeing that you refer to delays and transmission
tony dinkel wrote:
There are large companies here in So Cal that consider things like
Nextel walkie talkie an integral part of their emergency restoration
plan. There is nothing funnier than to be in a conference room with
a bunch of execs trying to talk to each other on their PTT
I'm using a 450-470 DB-420 on the same pair and it works great.
Jamey Wright
KD4SIY
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Repeater-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:30 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
You read the price list incorrectly. They are indicating that the DTD-1 is NLA.
Glad the small board does what you want. It's been a while but I do remember
there are several ways to filter a square wave out to more of a sine wave, but
as long as the basic job of Id'ing is done that's what
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which proposal is that?
Joe M.
George Henry wrote:
That pretty much puts the final nail in the coffin of TASMA's
proposal
Their proposal to allocate 4 digital repeater pairs with outputs in
the 145.5 -
Nate Duehr wrote:
Mathematics shows that in cases where some stations can hear others,
whereas a third station (or fourth, fifth, sixth) can only hear one of
the original two stations, there's a cap on effective channel throughput
as eventually the channel (in the worst-case scenario)
Larry wrote:
Not being familiar with the NFCC Voting system ... I'm looking for
enlightenment.
(Snip)
Under the NFCC's proportional voting system, 93 votes were cast in favor
of
the motion by 19 members, and 54 against by 11 members.
(Snip)
Please explain ... 147 votes by 30
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One down side would be the internet gateway. I can direct a call
to the
DSTAR repeater in Malibu, CA from here in Temple, Texas and have
no
idea whether the channel in Malibu had analog traffic
We have used a DB-420 450 to 470 on our ham repeater for years with no problem.
Where are you guy's at?
John
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:30 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Lightning Damage, new
Milt wrote:
You read the price list incorrectly. They are indicating that the
DTD-1 is NLA.
Glad the small board does what you want. It's been a while but I do
remember there are several ways to filter a square wave out to more
of a sine wave, but as long as the basic job of Id'ing is
Bob Dengler wrote:
Kenwood SkyCommand. 100s of remote bases in SoCal. I won't speak for
other areas, since I'm not familiar with what operators in those areas
consider their systems to be. Here, they're auxiliary stations. Don't
believe me? Consider that back in the early 70's when
Burt tnx for the info
Jerry VE3 EXT
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HELLO,
go to www.qsl.net/w4xethere is a smal plug that feeds the RF
sections...this web site shows how to wire in this plug when now
using regular GE P?S.
hopes this helpsgod bless
Hello Group,
I
What are you hearing that is going to come out to define repeaters, remote
bases, and auxiliary stations, and when will this be out?
Thanks
Glenn N1GBY
Hi
The fact that a D-Star repeater is made to transmit by another station via
the internet does not make it an auxiliary station. This is
Gran - go direct to Com Spec. Their price is currently listed as $69.95 -
and nothing on their (Com Spec's) page says anything about it being
discontinued.
73 de Mark - N9WYS
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Gran Clark
If you look at the price list is says
Each member has a proportional number of votes consistent with the
number of licensed hams that live in their area. So, one member may have
1 vote who is in the middle of nowhere compared with someone in a
populated area having 12 votes.
Hard to understand? Look at the Electoral College. Someone
Actually, if you read that it is not contradictory to the NFCC's letter.
There is actually a similar motion within the NFCC to similarly expand
the repeater sub-band.
Their proposal is interesting, however. If they believe they are AUX
stations, no petition is required - AUX operation is legal
Mark
This is where I got the information. I made the
comment discontinued in error. They say NO LONGER AVAILABLE
which is about the same when it comes to purchasing.
Gran
http://www.com-spec.com/price.htm
At 09:46 AM 9/21/2007, you wrote:
Gran go direct to Com Spec
Their price is
Look again. You are looking at the wrong item.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Gran Clark
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Slick Identifier
Mark
This is where I got the
One of our local repeaters was upgraded to an APCO P25 machine earlier
this week, I like the fact that this protocol supports conventional FM
voice as well.
Like others have posted, I look at things from an Emergency
Communications/Interoperability standpoint as well.
I caution any
Anyone have an extra Amp available for spare parts. It looks like I've
lost one of the finals due to self oscillation and destruction.
Polyfet has a few in stock (lotsa $$$) but it's no longer reccommended
for new designs. I can't seem to find a suitable (newer)substitute
using the AT
Don KA9QJG wrote:
__,_.
Speaking of the Alnico DR-235 , I had A Ham Friend Who was told by a
Ham Radio Dealer with four State stores the Radio has been
discontinued , They had one left , and the Reason was the New Model
would come out made with Lead free Solder
I have
Nate Duehr wrote:
Don KA9QJG wrote:
__,_.
Speaking of the Alnico DR-235 , I had A Ham Friend Who was told by
a Ham Radio Dealer with four State stores the Radio has been
discontinued , They had one left , and the Reason was the New Model
would come out made with Lead free Solder
I am looking to replace the local 2m repeater antenna. I found the
Antenex FG1443 at an attractive price on the Web and am looking for any
experiences/opinions on it. I have been thinking about a Hustler
G6-144B but I am willing to trade a bit of gain for a more rugged
antenna that will remain
* n0qzv_jhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Sep 21 00:08 -0500]:
The DB 404 and 408 are great antennas, however I just purchased an
Antenex YDA-4404 which is a regular 4 bay dipole. It is not as heavy
duty as the DB antennas but is still better than most fiberglass
antennas. It is tuneable and
I had the 220 MHz 3 dB model (FG2203) up three years at 250 feet side mounted
on a very large tower with no problems.
Roger W5RD
- Original Message -
From: Nate Bargmann
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 4:52 PM
Subject:
At 10:56 AM 9/21/2007, you wrote:
Look again. You are looking at the wrong item.
DTD-1== NO LONGER AVAILABLE
ID-8 69.95 66.46 62.96 59.46 55.96
I have been looking at the ID-8 Identifier not
At 9/21/2007 07:02, you wrote:
Bob Dengler wrote:
Kenwood SkyCommand. 100s of remote bases in SoCal. I won't speak for
other areas, since I'm not familiar with what operators in those areas
consider their systems to be. Here, they're auxiliary stations. Don't
believe me? Consider
I guess I don't understand your problem then. I thought you wanted the ID-8
which is available for $69.95.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Gran Clark
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
I finally have the programming of this beast almost figured out, but I
now have a new problem : The receiver is out of lock. Is there some
physical adjustment I need to make inside the unit, or is it hidden
somewhere in the programmer? I have it programmed for 146.61-.
Thanks in advance for
I recently purchased a used RC-110 Controller.(all I can afford)
Somehow I have messed up the voice chip output amp resulting in
distorted audio. Does anyone have the capability to record the audio
on a new voice chip for this unit? (thanks Ken for looking) Perhaps
someone has a controller that
- Original Message -
From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all
repeaters as repeaters
[snip]
You're right-the definition is pretty loose. Some of it
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Making room for the new guy - repeater
coordination - Hope this is not too o
What are you hearing that is going to
Read my earlier post under the Making room for the new guy... thread as to
why their belief that they are aux stations is false.
73,
George, KA3HSW
- Original Message -
From: MCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 12:15 PM
Subject:
38 matches
Mail list logo
