Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On May 8, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote: Like I said, mine were the smaller red and black ones. I believe 35 amp. I have never crimped them, just soldered. I believe they are advertised as being able to just solder if so desired. Maybe that's the problem. Chuck WB2EDV Chuck,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Identify a coax and possible connector vendor

2009-05-09 Thread Jim Brown
I have successfully used standard 50 Ohm type N connectors on 75 Ohm CATV coax.  I purchased some brass tubing from a hobby shop that fit the ID of the center pin of the 50 Ohm connector and sweat soldered a short piece to the copper clad center conductor on the coax.  With this modification

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Chuck Kelsey
I went to the Anderson site and found the installation instructions. They do recommend crimping the connection, but then do go on to discuss soldering. So, I will agree that crimping, with the proper tool, would be the best choice for reliable operation and is what the manufacturer recommends.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A Home Brew 224 MHz Repeater Project. - (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread John J. Riddell
Skipp, I had some (small connectors) that were made by TYCO and they seemed to have a much better spring in them and it took a lot more force to pull them apart. I suspect that soldering them may cause some of the problem, so I now have the proper' crimp tool. When you solder them the solder

[Repeater-Builder] Re: A Home Brew 224 MHz Repeater Project. - (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread skipp025
re: Anderson Power Poles Revisited Hi John, I didn't have a problem with the mated connectors pulling apart although without the locking hardware I suppose that could be another problem. My issue is with the tongue contact pressure of two mated connectors. The metal quality is not good

[Repeater-Builder] Two questions

2009-05-09 Thread w4sef
Hi all, I am new at the GE Mastr II gameIs there a point on the receiver board where I can tap off to get an S meter reading? I would like to be able to monitor the signal incoming. Also, be able to see if there is any rise in meter reading with no signal coming in to check for desense

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A Home Brew 224 MHz Repeater Project. - (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
I had the same problem with the ones I bought from an eBay seller. Once I went to the real Anderson power poles that the problems went away. The chinese made ones slide together, the real Andersons snap together. I had a friend of mine buy me a small stash of the real ones from K7WWG

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
Where are you located? I have a portable HP storage scope. Mike WA6ILQ At 06:21 PM 05/08/09, you wrote: I have the factory Anderson Power Products 1309G2 crimper and legit APP parts. I just built a two pole loop connector hung 4# from the loop with no separation. It did separate with a 5#

[Repeater-Builder] 450 Micor Repeator Amp

2009-05-09 Thread k0jxi
I am sure this has been asked before but I could not find any comprehensive links. Will the Motorola 450 to 470 75 watt Micor Repeater Amp TLE1713A work safely in the ham band on TX of 444.900. Most of my experience is with GE and not Motorola. Appreciate any advice. Dale, K0JXI

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 450 Micor Repeator Amp

2009-05-09 Thread Captainlance
yes, no problems.Just keep the drive between 1.5 and 2 watts, with the power set adjusted for 80 watts or less at the antenna port... Lance N2HBA - Original Message - From: k0jxi To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 12:52 PM Subject:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On May 9, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Chuck Kelsey wrote: To me it seems odd that a connector designed for DC power isn't polarized. Yes, there is a loose standard out there, but the two halves can be configured several ways. The standard's not very loose... if you buy just about any pre-made

RE: [Repeater-Builder] (Anderson Power Poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Eric Lemmon
Actually, West Mountain Radio has already created a de facto standard that just happens to agree with the practice used by many ARES and RACES groups. If you buy any of the Rig Runner or other DC power management products, they will be configured to this standard polarization as shown here:

[Repeater-Builder] Spectra RX sensitivity questions

2009-05-09 Thread Mark
I have a Spectra converted for operation on the amateur portion of the 900 MHz band. This thing seems to be somewhat deaf - it barely opens squelch while the same signal on a GTX (either handheld or mobile) is much stronger, and when squelch is open, the signal; is markedly weaker. Is there

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Martin A Flynn
Mike, After posting, I rigged up my Fluke 199C (200MHz) to the audio generator through the powerpole connector.. I beat the heck out of the connector to see if there would be any artifacts. I saw nothing. If your HP scope is faster, I'll ship the pigtails to you for a sanity check.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread MCH
Not exaxtly. With two colors (black and red) there is the standard way, reversed standard, 90 degrees to the right both ways (stacked), and 90 degrees to the left both ways (again, stacked, only reverse stacked). There are also eight more ways using cross-polarization between the two. That's

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Spectra RX sensitivity questions

2009-05-09 Thread motarolla_doctor
Yes there have been many 900 Spectras over the years that exhibit poor receive sensitivity. Check the Rx/Tx antenna switch diodes. The receive shunting diode may be shorted. This is caused by high reflected power. The RF amp/mixer transistor goes soft and looses gain. Mark n9...@... wrote:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On May 9, 2009, at 5:12 PM, MCH wrote: Not exaxtly. With two colors (black and red) there is the standard way, reversed standard, 90 degrees to the right both ways (stacked), and 90 degrees to the left both ways (again, stacked, only reverse stacked). There are also eight more ways using

RE: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Daron Wilson
I've enjoyed the power pole debate, somewhat. The simple answer is that no one solution fits every installation the best. The power pole is a great 'solution' for many installations, and is probably the hands down best for 'interoperability'. I have migrated almost everything to power

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Spectra RX sensitivity questions

2009-05-09 Thread Mark
Thanks! Unfortunately, I do not have board layout or schematic diagrams with which to locate the parts you referenced - can you send me a scan or photo of a board indicating where the diodes might be? I also assume the RF amp/mixer transistor is somewhere else, yes? Mark - N9WYS n9wys (at)

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Mike Naruta AA8K
One more. Let me play Devil's advocate. My mistake was buying terminals from a fellow ham who bought in quantity. I also made a mistake when I soldered some and used a crimp tool on others. My crimp tool did not expand the barrel, and the terminal still pushed freely into the housing. My

RE: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread Daron Wilson
My experience in industrial wiring with lugs, down to avionics connectors apparently doesn't matter. Nope, this is a different kind of connector. You must buy the connectors and a specific crimp tool from only one manufacturer This is fairly common on many products actually. There is no

Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread MCH
Quote (quoting you - which you deleted from the quotes): Also just to be accurate, there aren't many ways they can be configured, only two Quoting me (condensed): Not exaxtly. That's at least 16 ways to configure them. That is a FACT, not opinion. I described 16 unique ways they could be

CORRECTION Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread MCH
I have to correct something I said. I forgot that while the PPs are genderless as far as the connectors go, the KEYWAYS are not, so half of the 16 configurations will not mate. As such, there are only 8 configurations that will mate. See the attached pic. Number 1 is the ARES/RACES standard,