On Aug 21, 2009, at 9:00 PM, n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 8/21/2009 16:16, you wrote:
Because CTCSS falses on the random noise.
Been there, done that, gave away the t-shirt.
A GE Versatone decoder won't false. IMO only defective CTCSS decoders
false on white noise.
Bob NO6B
Agreed Bob, the
Won't happen with a properly set up system. Think and squelch.
Since there are only four repeater pairs on ten shared with everyone,
shame on anyone for using carrier squelch there.
Because CTCSS falses on the random noise.
Been there, done that, gave
away the t-shirt.
Al, k9si
pl...@xmission.com wrote:
From: Paul Plack pl...@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Squelch action on 10 m FM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, August 21, 2009, 5:27 PM
Perhaps one the remaining contributions we could make
Because CTCSS falses on the random noise.
Been there, done that, gave away the t-shirt.
WalterH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, n...@... wrote:
At 8/20/2009 23:17, you wrote:
John, how's this for an experiment...
Configure a repeater with two receivers, one built for +/- 5
: Friday, August 21, 2009 5:16 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Squelch action on 10 m FM
Because CTCSS falses on the random noise.
Been there, done that, gave away the t-shirt.
WalterH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, n...@... wrote:
At 8/20/2009 23:17, you wrote
At 8/21/2009 16:16, you wrote:
Because CTCSS falses on the random noise.
Been there, done that, gave away the t-shirt.
A GE Versatone decoder won't false. IMO only defective CTCSS decoders
false on white noise.
Bob NO6B
6 matches
Mail list logo
