Repeater Builder
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jack Davis 
To: No Reply 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 5925


I did remove a full turn off both helical resonators on the output of the 
receiver oscillator, they do have a big peak in the center and a smaller peak 
all the way out.  The test set meter readings are in the ballpark of what the 
manual calls for but it just does not make it.  I used the instructions on the 
RB wed site for the conversion, if there are some optimized  values I would 
sure like to hear about them.  I put a GASFET preamp on it and it may be usable 
but I have a nagging feeling it is just not right.  Low drive could sure be a 
factor, if there was a dead device somewhere in the path it would be a bigger 
problem than what I have.  

Jack
K6YC
Re: MII Receiver 
Posted by: "Doug Bade" [EMAIL PROTECTED]   kd8b2005 
Fri Dec 7, 2007 5:29 am (PST) 
While I have never seen or heard of a case, it may be possible.. 
However, it is most likely not the case. I suspect insufficient drive 
from the oscillator chain through to the mixer.. The copper helical 
bandpass filter at the end of the L.O. chain will not tune without 
mods, getting them into the correct range was a lot of trial and 
error for me, and is suspect in my opinion. Insufficient injection 
level after a L.O. mod on any Mastr II conversion is normally the 
culprit of low sensitivity, OR you have something tuned to a wrong 
lobe.....in one of the helicals right now... There are more than one 
"peak" in some cases...

Doug
KD8B

At 01:56 AM 12/7/2007, you wrote:

>Do the Mastr II 800 MHz receivers have the "tin whisker" problems 
>that some of the other bands do? I have one I converted to 900 MHz 
>and the sensitivity will not go below 2.2 microvolt's for 12 db of 
>SINAD. I have tuned it right by the book and it never gets any 
>better. I have not opened up the helical resonators, but that will 
>be the next step.
>
>Thanks
>Jack
>K6YC
>


Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post 
Messages in this topic (3) 

Reply via email to