If you have a nearby first adjacent (especially at 20 kHz), you might be
better off with a standard receiver. Might be worth measuring it and
comparing it against a standard receiver - I'd be curious to hear the
results as I've never done that test myself.
--- Jeff WN3A
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 5:45 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] To DVP or not to DVP
>
>
>
> Hmmm... I didn't realize the DVP has a wider IF. I gather DVP
> requires up to 6 Khz of audio. So now I'm thinking that this
> receiver is not suitable for my busy hill (Santiago Peak).
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Tim
> :wq
>
> On Sep 6, 2010, at 8:17 PM, Jeff DePolo wrote:
>
> > The SP docs show it being a DVP station. DVP receivers have
> wider (and
> > flatter) IF filtering than standard Micor Sensitron
> receivers. They need a
> > flatter IF passband to decode DVP properly. I'm wondering
> if that's why the
> > 20 dBQ reading comes out higher than normal.
>
>
>
>
>
