On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Kris Kirby wrote:
There is one issue that needs to be handled. When a D-Star repeater
hears another user on the input for a callsign not it's own, the modem
is captured, and any input packet that starts or is received in the
middle of that transmission is
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:32 AM, k7pfj wrote:
Unless you have a Aeroflex 3920 with the options you can scan DStar as well
as Mototrbo and all others.
Well, at least until the P25 guys turn on encryption. :-)
A whole new learning curve.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Doug Bade wrote:
Yes... Icom oversold it..
Actually they did an okay job on the radios, JARL did a really piss-poor job
on the streaming standard, and Icom REALLY screwed up the distribution of a
Linux server...
(Build Apache from SOURCE CODE as a normal way to
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Nate Duehr wrote:
Actually they did an okay job on the radios, JARL did a really
piss-poor job on the streaming standard,
The radio interface isn't so bad until you get into programming all
fourteen menu items that have to be set to make communication happen
through a
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Nate Duehr wrote:
p.s. Before anyone thinks this is a plug or a rant either way for or
against any technology mentioned above, be advised that I've been
working on bugs like this my entire career, and watching engineers
make the same mistakes over and over and over again
I would strongly remind them that they are purchasing a system that has
only ONE and only ONE supplier/source. This may not fit some of the bid
requirements that some government agencies require.
Joe
Kris Kirby wrote:
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
Around here (Western PA)
At 4/3/2010 15:35, you wrote:
I would strongly remind them that they are purchasing a system that has
only ONE and only ONE supplier/source. This may not fit some of the bid
requirements that some government agencies require.
Joe
A well-written sole source justification memo takes care of that.
Besides, doesn't that assume they will be adding more user units to it?
In this case, it's likely a one-shot deal, so they won't care about future
sources.
Joe M.
On Sat 03/04/10 7:00 PM , n...@no6b.com sent:
At 4/3/2010 15:35, you wrote:
I would strongly remind them that they are
My biggest problem with the D-Star repeaters is that they didn't make
them analog compatible. Knowing as little as I do about the D-star
hardware, it would seem easy enough for Icom to have done so. All they
would have needed to do would have been to look at the incoming signal,
see if it was
: Re: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star Was: Molotora Gontor
My biggest problem with the D-Star repeaters is that they didn't make
them analog compatible. Knowing as little as I do about the D-star
hardware, it would seem easy enough for Icom to have done so. All they
would have needed to do would
that are focused on alternate D-Star hardware
and software devices.
Doug
KD8B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott Zimmerman
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 8:54 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] D
-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Doug Bade
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 9:50 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star Was: Molotora Gontor
I would be glad to elaborate about D-Star Repeater conversions as there are
multiple ways to do it now and Any
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
Around here (Western PA) the governments bought Icom D-Star radios for
RACES. I had no objection to that since those radios can be used in
analog modes with analog repeaters. Now they are wanting to get D-Star
repeaters for RACES and emergency use.
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Doug Bade wrote:
I would be glad to elaborate about D-Star Repeater conversions as
there are multiple ways to do it now and Any EDACS capable or Smartnet
Capable repeater would do D-Star as both fundamentally have the parts
to transmit and receive GMSK type waveforms
If you don't count the Icom scanning receivers. They CAN decode D-STAR.
Joe M.
Kris Kirby wrote:
There's also a substantial base of users who like D-STAR because there
isn't a scanner that can decode it.
Unless you have a Aeroflex 3920 with the options you can scan DStar as well as
Mototrbo and all others.
Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ
6886 Sage Ave
Firestone, CO 80504
303-736-9693
k7...@skybeam.com
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, MCH wrote:
If you don't count the Icom scanning receivers. They
I do not know that it needs to be handled... The day we have enough
D-Star repeaters and users on the air that an out of town DX signal
trips mine I will be tickled to death... not complainBecause JRRL
did not put an equivalent to CTCSS or DSQ in the system does not make it
need repair...
At 4/2/2010 09:49, you wrote:
There's also a substantial base of users who like D-STAR because there
isn't a scanner that can decode it.
Funny you should mention that. A pair of bootleggers using D-STAR showed
up on the input to a friend's 2 meter analog repeater. After a couple of
months he
18 matches
Mail list logo
