[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10/1/2008 07:20, you wrote:
I have had good luck with 222 MHz Ringo Ranger. It is a little heavier
construction and has a reasonably flat pattern.
I don't recommend the Ringo Ranger for any duplex application. The gain is
overstated they have feedline
W5ZIT
--- On Thu, 10/2/08, wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antenna recommendations 220
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 8:53 AM
Our solution was to add radials from a junk Stationmaster
Tim and Janet wrote:
This is a side mounted installation on a tower, Rohn 25. The first
G7-220 antenna was damaged in the wind. The current one seems to get
noisy at times and we suspect the antenna as the culprit. When we
installed this one we also used a standoff to help stabilize the top
At 10/1/2008 07:20, you wrote:
I have had good luck with 222 MHz Ringo Ranger. It is a little heavier
construction and has a reasonably flat pattern.
I don't recommend the Ringo Ranger for any duplex application. The gain is
overstated they have feedline decoupling issues. Even if you use
Bob, What do you know about the HUSTLER Spirit Series of antennas.any good?
-Mike
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sgreact47
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:35 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antenna
5 matches
Mail list logo
