Re: [Reproducible-builds] java.util.Properties writer and

Le 29/05/2016 à 00:02, Sascha Steinbiss a écrit : > I was wondering whether you have encountered this issue before and in general > what your thoughts are. Hi Sascha, I confirmed that I encountered this issue with the property files generated by Ant... and I fixed it last week [1] ;) I haven't

[Reproducible-builds] java.util.Properties writer and

Hi Emmanuel, sorry for contacting you out of the blue, but I have noticed your kind help for the Debian Med and Reproducible Builds teams before, so I was just going to try my luck again ;) I am currently trying to make king [1] reproducible, which is currently not built reproducibly because

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825674: libsemanage: please make the build reproducible

Source: libsemanage Version: 2.5-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libsemanage could

[Reproducible-builds] strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 16:10:27 +0200 Source: strip-nondeterminism Binary: libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl strip-nondeterminism dh-strip-nondeterminism Architecture: source Version: 0.017-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

Re: [Reproducible-builds] locale woes

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:01:13AM -0700, Scarlett Clark wrote: > > I need the locale settings for both builders please. > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/index_variations.html > > > Thanks, now the problem is

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

Hi Martin, On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:51:45AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Right. We (HPE) placed an order for some boards and they will be > shipped to ETH Zurich. It's 4 Cello boards for reproducible builds > and some more boards for other use cases (maybe ci.debian.net). looking much

Re: [Reproducible-builds] locale woes

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:01:13AM -0700, Scarlett Clark wrote: > I need the locale settings for both builders please. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/index_variations.html -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Reproducible-builds] locale woes

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:08:40AM -0700, Scarlett Clark wrote: > I am having some issues with locales. And rejections from all over. [...] > Setting export LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 in debian/rules works but rejected as > "hackish" so after further investigation... > > Yes, it is kconfig_compiler > >

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1_source.changes

strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.017.orig.tar.gz strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1_source.changes

strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.017.orig.tar.gz strip-nondeterminism_0.017-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825656: libsepol: please make the build reproducible

Source: libsepol Version: 2.5-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libsepol could not be

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825655: libselinux: please make the build reproducible

Source: libselinux Version: 2.5-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libselinux could not

Re: [Reproducible-builds] kde package sets incomplete/insufficient?

I am not sure why kapptemplate is not there, I thought that was shipped with applications. Choqok is under collab-maint ( whatever that even means, I do not know ) And kdevelop falls under kde-extras I am afraid I do not know the Debian structure of all the KDE packages. Everything outside of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825643: dash: please make the build reproducible

Source: dash Version: 0.5.8-2.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that dash could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825634: miceamaze: please make the build reproducible

Source: miceamaze Version: 4.2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that miceamaze could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825629: libgd-perl: FTBFS: Could not find gdlib-config in the search path.

Source: libgd-perl Version: 2.53-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, libgd-perl fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#825628: jekyll: FTBFS: 433 tests, 675 assertions, 5 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

Source: jekyll Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, jekyll fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] kde package sets incomplete/insufficient?

Hi Scarlett, after reading http://scarlettgatelyclark.com/2016/debian-outreachy-debian-reproducible-builds-week-1-progress-report/ I checked https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/amd64/pkg_set_kde.html and

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope is marked for autoremoval from testing

diffoscope 52 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-03 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 824895: btrfs-progs: [PATCH] warn against likely data loss 824896: btrfs-progs: [PATCH] fix serious errors in debian/copyright ___