diffoscope 59 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-09-20
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
826300: fpc: fp-compiler not installable on powerpc since glibc 2.23
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
reprotest 0.2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-09-20
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
826300: fpc: fp-compiler not installable on powerpc since glibc 2.23
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
tags 835055 + pending
thanks
> This is particularly a problem for future packaging of a version outside
> of debian (foreign distro) as this tests will always fail leading to an
> un-packagable state.
Thanks for reporting. We can at least detect this and skip the the tests
with a message
Package: diffoscope
The GHC tests are too tightly bound to a very specific ghc version (in
this case ghc 7.1.0.3) and the test will fail if the HI-version
mismatche (hi magic in this case is 33214052).
In such case the diffoscope internal will select a fallback
FilesystemComperator instead of the
Ximin Luo:
> Signatures provide a way to for us to aggregate public trust on binaries that
> don't build themselves. So it's important to have multiple and *very direct*
> meanings of what-is-being-signed, to avoid a transitive-trust situation.
>
I sent this in a rush; better version:
Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 04:01:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> You have this backwards.
>>
>> "Being able to verify individually who build each of the packages I'm
>> running"
>>
>> is *exactly* what is required to *not* have to
>>
>> "attribute trust of *all* of the people
Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:13:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> I have trouble imagining what could make Buildinfo.tgz hard, but make
>> Buildinfo.xz easy - could you explain this in more detail, please?
>
> Debian's archive information is largely stored within a database;
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 04:01:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:13:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> Note that the builder is a *distinct entity* from the distribution.
> >> It's important to keep the *original* signature by B on C. It breaks
> >> our
Source: kxmlgui
Version: 5.25.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: uname
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that kxmlgui could not be built
Source: sheepdog
Version: 0.8.3-4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that sheepdog could not be built
FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 56
Current version: 59
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:13:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Note that the builder is a *distinct entity* from the distribution.
>> It's important to keep the *original* signature by B on C. It breaks
>> our security logic, to strip the signature and re-sign C using (e.g.)
>>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:13:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell:
> > Having been impressed by the current status of reproducible builds
> > and the fact it looks like we're close to having the important
> > pieces in Debian proper, I have started to have a look at how I
> > could
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 01:37:47PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> The attached patch fixes several issues:
Sorry, forgot to attach the patch.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index be2fd60..ebadea0 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Uploaders: Sebastien
Source: oss4
Version: 4.2-build2010-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: locale timestamps fileordering umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we
Source: twitter-bootstrap3
Version: 3.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that
Source: eyed3
Version: 0.6.18-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that eyed3 could not be built
Source: auto-apt-proxy
Version: 1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
auto-apt-proxy fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
18 matches
Mail list logo
