Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-25 Thread Adrian Smith

This is from the pdf product info file I downloaded from Sony last 
year before we bought our drive

DDS-4 drives provide full backward compatibility with the
ability to read  write to DDS-3, DDS-2 and DDS-1 tapes.
While enabling tape sizes (and costs) to be matched to the
backup job, DDS-4 provides an easy upgrade path. Not only
is it possible to move up from one format to another but
also to operate in mixed environments.

Hope that helps.

Adrian Smith


I'll check this out later today.

matt barkdull wrote:

  I don't think the DDS-3 drives will read the DDS-1 tapes, but will
  read the DDS-2.

  Basically this means they are one step backward compatible.

  DDS-3 will read/write DDS-2
  DDS-2 will read/write DDS-1

  DDS-1 cannot read/write DDS-2
  DDS-2 cannot read/write DDS-3


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-24 Thread matt barkdull

I don't think the DDS-3 drives will read the DDS-1 tapes, but will 
read the DDS-2.

Basically this means they are one step backward compatible.

DDS-3 will read/write DDS-2
DDS-2 will read/write DDS-1

DDS-1 cannot read/write DDS-2
DDS-2 cannot read/write DDS-3


DavidRoss wrote:
  I like the HP DDS/DAT drives.  

thanks for the info on this ... Sounds like these could fit in as a part
of my overall multi-faceted backup system (I think I want a USB disc,
too). 

Now, can you tell me:  Someone else informed me of the DDS-1 -2 -3
breakdowns and the different megs the tapes handled.  My question:  will
one drive accept ALL THREE tapes, or does each tape have to be used with
ts own drive?

thanks, David -

  - ilyes



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-24 Thread David Ross

  I like the HP DDS/DAT drives.  
 
 thanks for the info on this ... Sounds like these could fit in as a part
 of my overall multi-faceted backup system (I think I want a USB disc,
 too).
 
 Now, can you tell me:  Someone else informed me of the DDS-1 -2 -3
 breakdowns and the different megs the tapes handled.  My question:  will
 one drive accept ALL THREE tapes, or does each tape have to be used with
 ts own drive?

DDS-1 will read DDS-1
DDS-2 will read DDS-2 and DDS-1
DDS-3 will read DDS-3 and DDS-2 and DDS-1
and so on.
The early DDS and DDS-DC drives tended to be a bit balky about reading
anything including the ones they wrote.

Tape drives are mechanical and at their core they move a piece of flimsy
plastic at incredible speeds over a polished metal surface. And they
have to do it very accurately time after time after time. They will wear
out. Or the power supply will go bad. Until I switched to HP units I
figured on tossing a drive and starting over after a couple of years. HP
has a program where you can sign up for an extended warranty for $45 to
$60 per year. If you have a bad drive you get a replacement. And the
interesting thing is the HP units don't fail as often as other brands
I've dealt with.

Want to make a tape drive fail?
1. Ignore dust and grit. Make sure you leave it out while they replaster
the office next door.
2. Don't put any power protection on the drive. After all why would the
power company supply bad power.
3. Leave your tapes in the sun lit window. Or better yet in the back of
the car.
You get the picture.

I like HP DDS for the type of offices I deal with. Currently I support a
mix of DDS-1 and DDS-3 with one DDS-2 about to be retired. Over all the
HP units work great. But I do have a large collection of Sony DDS-2
drives that I think are bad due to the APS cases they sit in. When I
need more storage I'll likely go with AIT, Mammoth, or VXA. VXA is new
and looks neat but I need something with more time under it's belt. It's
web site has some interesting movies but they don't tell me much.


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-24 Thread David Ross

I'll check this out later today.

matt barkdull wrote:
 
 I don't think the DDS-3 drives will read the DDS-1 tapes, but will
 read the DDS-2.
 
 Basically this means they are one step backward compatible.
 
 DDS-3 will read/write DDS-2
 DDS-2 will read/write DDS-1
 
 DDS-1 cannot read/write DDS-2
 DDS-2 cannot read/write DDS-3


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-23 Thread Malcolm McLeary

Hi David,

Thanks for your comments.  You raise some very valid issues, but I probably
wasn't verbose enough to adequately describe my strategy.

on 23/2/01 7:51 PM, David Ross at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The major problem with using a disk drive duplication backup strategy is
 that it leaves a lot of holes.
 1. You're w/o a backup while the current one is running. So if things
 die during the backup 

Agreed, but I don't duplicate ... I use a combination of recycle and normal
backups.  The act of recycle will erase the previous backup, but I will come
to that.  After the recycle the rest of the week is normals so it adds to
the backup set ... it does not replace it.  You may recall that I size my
second drive to hold a full backup plus a week of incrementals.

 2. You can't go back in time to get a file that you didn't notice was
 missing or corrupted till after the last backup.

Within the week I can as I do the recycle on Sunday, then nightly
incrementals.  On Saturday night I backup the "backup" disk to tape so I can
store the previous weeks backups off site.  This is done before the disk
based backup set is recycled.

 3. Destruction of the primary system has a good chance of destroying the
 backup drive.

Agreed, but I never said that they were on the same machine ... in most of
my installations the backup disk and tape drive are in the "Backup Server"
... the "source" is elsewhere on the network.

In a single machine situation both disks might be be destroyed but a
connected tape drive will likely suffer the same fate.

The key is to do backups and do them often.  I find changing media a pain
... my strategy is based on the desire to do daily backups, but to only
change removeable media weekly.

Cheers,  Malcolm



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-23 Thread ilyes

DavidRoss wrote:
 I like the HP DDS/DAT drives.  

thanks for the info on this ... Sounds like these could fit in as a part
of my overall multi-faceted backup system (I think I want a USB disc,
too).  

Now, can you tell me:  Someone else informed me of the DDS-1 -2 -3
breakdowns and the different megs the tapes handled.  My question:  will
one drive accept ALL THREE tapes, or does each tape have to be used with
ts own drive?

thanks, David -

 - ilyes


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-22 Thread SK Suh

At 10:52 AM -0500 02/21/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I go with a tape
system for backing up, or stick with a hd?

I've always found it more affordable to do multiple backups to tape 
instead of convincing others to purchase multiple HDs.

Stephen K. Suh

__
Network Admin Tel 613/228-0250
SCG Studio Colour Group Inc.  Fax 613/228-0254
6 Gurdwara Road, Suite 105
Ottawa, ON K2E 8A3 Canada   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-22 Thread Donovan Brooke



I personally would get a buslink USB hard drive (or two or howevermany
you need.)
I might get some flack for suggesting this but It works great and its
cheaper than tape.
You also never have to change a tape. The only thing to be leary
about is its extention.
being yet another 3rd party extention it might not play well with some.
I have tested this
in two different situations and it works great. We backup maybe
60 gigs just about
every day. This translates to 48 or so gigs (after 2 months)
with Retros compression on.
My next step is to impliment another one of these drives and start a
rotating backup
scheme so I can keep a copy off site. ( if anyone has a
step by step for this I'd
appreciate it. ) This single Hard Drive has been backing up for
about two months
and can probably go for about another month before I will have to either
re-write it
or switch to another HD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using an external SCSI hd for my backups
for over a year, and
all has been going swimmingly -- 'til a few days ago when I
inadvertently shut off the external before the system had properly
shut
it down. The 'wrapper' and a couple of places on the 'extent'
files
were blown, damaged beyond fixing. I urgently need a replacement.
Now that I have the option, my dilemma is: Should I go with a tape
system for backing up, or stick with a hd? How long does a tape
last
before it gets stretched, or worn beyond useability?
I'm using a G4/400/9.0.4 ... a single user, not on any network.
Would
very much appreciate any and all feedback from yr personal experience
re: 1) tape or hd, and 2) specifically WCH tape system y'all are most
satisfied with, as I've never used one before. Retrospect is
TERRIFIC,
and so at least ONE part of my solution is already in place.
TIA,

-- Donovan
D. Brooke
Systems Administrator/
Assc. Art Director
Epsen
Hillmer Graphics

"When 900 years old you reach,
look as good you will not, hm?"
-Yoda


Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-22 Thread Malcolm McLeary

on 22/2/01 2:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Should I go with a tape system for backing up, or stick with a hd?

Not really an easy question to answer because selecting appropriate media
depends a lot on how much data needs to be backed up.

Personally I like to use both.  My general strategy is to have a 2nd disk
with sufficient capacity to hold a full backup and a week of nightly
incrementals.  At the end of the week I do a backup to tape then recycle the
disk based storage sets.  I cycle the tapes off site.  Depending on the
capacity of the tape, the end of week tape may be a full backup or it may be
a backup of the backup disk.

In developing a backup strategy its always a compromise between cost and
potential to lose data.

Cheers,  Malcolm



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-22 Thread Donovan Brooke



Hey Erik, your point about the "...6months ago..." is true!.
This is why we have elected to get yet another USB drive when it comes
to it.
The 3rd drive will always be an old back-up. 3 drives will cost
us $1200.00. We think this will provide the security we need
and still for
less cost than tape. However, its a pretty ambiguous decision.
ie...Firetape is $800 and each tape is $250 (from pre-release article)
Tapes are 50 gigs as apposed to the HD's being 60. I think you get
one free tape with the Firetape. So, it would cost a total of almost
$1600 (4 tapes) which would give you a bit more space. A little cheaper
to go with HD's... but not much.
Erik Ableson wrote:

Back
to the list after a long absence - the only issue with hard drive solutions
is that they are not complete backup solutions since if anything truly
disastrous happens (theft, fire etc) all your data is in one place.
Multiple HD's rotated off-site will take care of this but in the long run,
tape becomes cheaper when you start keeping redundant copies - and they've
saved my bacon a few times! Combining
them makes for the best of both worlds in terms of data security with a
local HD mirror for the quick accidental delete/system crash restores,
and tape to handle the long term issues - "umm that project I worked on
6 months ago is gone". Plus having tapes around gives you a nice
archival option to free up disk space.. Cheers,
ErikFeeling desperately insecure since
he isn't following his own advice at home :)

- Original Message -

From:Donovan
Brooke

To: retro-talk

Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001
5:04 PM

Subject: Re: tape or hard drive?


I personally would get a[snip]


Donovan




Re: tape or hard drive?

2001-02-22 Thread ilyes

thanks very much for taking the time to share yr backup strategy with
me, Malcom -- excellent ideas, since I basically have had no overall
efficient strategy myself! i like yr idea of using a disc for
increments, then weekly backing to tape.  I'll also do off-site storage
for one backup set this time, too.

many thanks,

 - ilyes

PS:  I know there are many hi-end tape drives out there, but d'you know
of a reliable one in the $300-range?





--
"One who knows the secret of Sound knows the Mystery of
the Universe." -- Hazrat Inayat Khan


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.