Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220497162
@mengxr @andrewor14 @srowen Addressed all comments. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932#issuecomment-220497098
**[Test build #58930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58930/consoleFull)**
for PR 12932 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13108#issuecomment-220497073
@smungee sorry to have this gone stale. Do you mind bringing it up to date?
This seems useful to fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220497012
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220497011
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13108#issuecomment-220497014
**[Test build #2999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2999/consoleFull)**
for PR 13108 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220496978
**[Test build #58919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58919/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220496850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220496921
**[Test build #58924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58924/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932#issuecomment-220496823
**[Test build #2998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12932 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220496856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220496707
**[Test build #58918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58918/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932#issuecomment-220496773
@dosoft Thank you for the PR. What is the memory footprint of a leaked
driver?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932#issuecomment-220496577
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220496492
**[Test build #58928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58928/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208#issuecomment-220496476
**[Test build #58927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58927/consoleFull)**
for PR 13208 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11688#issuecomment-220496380
@mccheah can you close this one now
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12874 is merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12768#issuecomment-220496098
FYI I created https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208
It fixed a bug in this code and added a test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208#issuecomment-220496051
cc @yhuai for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208#issuecomment-220496022
cc @dosoft
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208
[SPARK-14990][SQL] Fix checkForSameTypeInputExpr (ignore nullability)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a bug in TypeUtils.checkForSameTypeInputExpr. Previously
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220495636
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220495541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220495544
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220495359
**[Test build #58917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58917/consoleFull)**
for PR 13201 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220494834
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220494836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220494714
**[Test build #58914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58914/consoleFull)**
for PR 13163 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220494664
**[Test build #58926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58926/consoleFull)**
for PR 13188 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63978870
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11915#issuecomment-220494307
@jaceklaskowski can you close this and reopen when you think it is ready?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63978864
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63978848
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#issuecomment-220494208
cc @hvanhovell can you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63978717
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220494012
but not the builder, which still uses `SQLContext.getOrCreate`:
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220493901
Ah, yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13196#issuecomment-220493923
**[Test build #2994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2994/consoleFull)**
for PR 13196 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-220493938
@koertkuipers this can be closed now right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220493679
That's been updated?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13203#issuecomment-220493600
@davies yes that was the old issue. Do you mean a warning for
`SparkSession.getOrCreate` in general? I think it's not necessary because
that's just the behavior of
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220493033
We should fix `session.py` to use the new scala thing as well. Also tests
are failing because python is still trying to call `wrapped`.
---
If your project is set
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9759#issuecomment-220492281
OK, you're really resolving SPARK-14989 here then as well.
You can use 2.7.4 it seems.
Yeah the issue is not jackson-core but any other jackson modules
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13206#issuecomment-220492228
**[Test build #58925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58925/consoleFull)**
for PR 13206 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220491675
**[Test build #58924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58924/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63977568
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13131
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13195#issuecomment-220491522
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13131#issuecomment-220491339
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13131#discussion_r63977325
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ class GaussianMixtureModel private[ml] (
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846#issuecomment-220491198
@rajeshbalamohan is this still a problem on master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13187#issuecomment-220491134
@srowen Ah, I will keep in mind that I should read comments more carefully.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63977203
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63976971
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63976948
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-220490142
Actually I'd love to have this...!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13206#issuecomment-220490181
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13206#issuecomment-220490179
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13206#issuecomment-220490100
**[Test build #58915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58915/consoleFull)**
for PR 13206 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220490045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220490030
**[Test build #2997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220490047
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220490007
**[Test build #2996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2996/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220489946
**[Test build #58913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58913/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220489852
**[Test build #58923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58923/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162#issuecomment-220489803
Merging in master/2.0. Thanks @jerryshao!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13187#issuecomment-220489424
I think he was saying that you using `LongAccumulator` for
`Accumulator[Int]`. I don't see anything that suggests this isn't the
replacement. It could have been done
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220489093
**[Test build #2995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220488738
Thanks, comments addressed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220488546
**[Test build #58922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58922/consoleFull)**
for PR 13188 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13131#issuecomment-220488159
I'm making a pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220487878
**[Test build #58921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58921/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13202
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220487675
**[Test build #2995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13202#issuecomment-220487463
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220487194
OK I've pushed a commit to handle sql listener properly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220486612
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220486610
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220486609
**[Test build #58920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58920/consoleFull)**
for PR 13188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220486512
**[Test build #58920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58920/consoleFull)**
for PR 13188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220485808
**[Test build #58919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58919/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220485088
**[Test build #58918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58918/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220485090
**[Test build #58917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58917/consoleFull)**
for PR 13201 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220484919
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220484922
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220484903
**[Test build #58916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58916/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63973393
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/tpcds/queries/ss_max.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+SELECT
--- End
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13205#issuecomment-220484314
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13205#issuecomment-220484311
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13205#issuecomment-220484167
**[Test build #58912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58912/consoleFull)**
for PR 13205 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#discussion_r63973282
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -93,26 +101,45 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#discussion_r63973275
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -738,26 +734,127 @@ object SparkSession {
* Gets an existing
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#discussion_r63973212
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -93,26 +101,45 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220483667
**[Test build #58916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58916/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220483378
cc @srowen @yhuai @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207
[SPARK-15424][SQL] Revert SPARK-14807 Create a hivecontext-compatibility
module
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I initially asked to create a hivecontext-compatibility module
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63971900
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ *
201 - 300 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
