Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13203#issuecomment-220456044
**[Test build #58904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58904/consoleFull)**
for PR 13203 at commit
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13203
[SPARK-15417][SQL][Python] PySpark shell always uses in-memory catalog
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is no way to use the Hive catalog in `pyspark-shell`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220454531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220454535
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220454396
**[Test build #58901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58901/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r6396
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -435,7 +438,19 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
else x.settings(Seq[Setting[_]](): _*)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220453725
**[Test build #58903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58903/consoleFull)**
for PR 13163 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220453068
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220453075
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220452813
**[Test build #58889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58889/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63954767
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13202#issuecomment-220450350
cc: @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220449991
**[Test build #58902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58902/consoleFull)**
for PR 13201 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220449305
There are many space changes. Please use this link
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201/files?w=1 to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220448993
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220448990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220448741
**[Test build #58901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58901/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220448864
**[Test build #58898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58898/consoleFull)**
for PR 13201 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13102#issuecomment-220448360
@rxin Thank you reynold for handling this. It was taking me a lot of time
to understand the dependencies. Thanks again ..
I will close this now.
---
If
Github user dilipbiswal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220447765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220447762
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220447465
**[Test build #58890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58890/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13199#issuecomment-220447414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13202#issuecomment-220447471
**[Test build #58900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58900/consoleFull)**
for PR 13202 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13199#issuecomment-220447421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220447148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220447151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13199#issuecomment-220447086
**[Test build #5 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13199 at commit
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13202
[SPARK-15414][MLlib] Make the mllib,ml linalg type conversion APIs public
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Open up APIs for converting between new, old linear algebra
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-220446944
@jkbradley see the discussion/proposed solutions on
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220446855
**[Test build #58884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58884/consoleFull)**
for PR 12850 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220446766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220446770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220446712
**[Test build #58899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58899/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220443688
**[Test build #58899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58899/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201#issuecomment-220443676
**[Test build #58898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58898/consoleFull)**
for PR 13201 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13201
[SPARK-15416][PySpark]Display a better message for not finding classes
removed in Spark 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If finding `NoClassDefFoundError` or
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220442699
Note that I still need to add some tests to cover the behavior of the new
builders.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200
[SPARK-15075][SQL] Cleanup dependencies between SQLContext and SparkSâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently SparkSession.Builder use SQLContext.getOrCreate. It should
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220442073
@andrewor14 comments addressed + ran `lint-java` locally and fixed all the
issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-220442030
LGTM
Merging with master and branch-2.0
Thanks!
@holdenk We can discuss this Pyspark Params issue more. I agree it will be
important to offer users
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220441597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220441596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220441446
**[Test build #58893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58893/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220438703
+cc @jkbradley @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220438005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220438006
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220437845
**[Test build #58891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58891/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220437364
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220437363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-220437293
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-220437291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-220437188
**[Test build #58897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58897/consoleFull)**
for PR 13139 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220437120
**[Test build #58886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58886/consoleFull)**
for PR 13177 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63945219
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220436565
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220436570
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220436538
**[Test build #58895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58895/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63943856
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -706,6 +711,35 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13186#issuecomment-220435752
actually maybe cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63944461
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -78,8 +77,9 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63944155
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -717,6 +751,20 @@ abstract class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13186#issuecomment-220435143
cc @sameeragarwal for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-220434968
**[Test build #58897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58897/consoleFull)**
for PR 13139 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#issuecomment-220434621
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#issuecomment-220434625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#issuecomment-220434443
**[Test build #58894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58894/consoleFull)**
for PR 12943 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63943606
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -706,6 +711,35 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220434211
Looks good, just a remaining nit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#discussion_r63943470
--- Diff:
launcher/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite.java
---
@@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ public void testClusterCmdBuilder()
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-220434180
I addressed the review comments. Please let me know what else there is.
Also, @yanboliang I'd be happy to add specific differences between R and Spark
if you have some
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63943394
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/GenerateColumnAccessor.scala
---
@@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ object GenerateColumnAccessor
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r63943317
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,197 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+##
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r63943262
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,197 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+##
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#discussion_r63943269
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitCommandBuilder.java
---
@@ -147,7 +156,7 @@
List args = new ArrayList<>();
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#issuecomment-220433675
**[Test build #58896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58896/consoleFull)**
for PR 13045 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r63943165
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,197 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+##
Github user JustinPihony commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#issuecomment-220431230
I just updated the branch to have no conflicts. Again, either the code
looks good to merge, or I can make JDBC a `CreatableRelationProvider` (but that
comes with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#issuecomment-220431086
**[Test build #58894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58894/consoleFull)**
for PR 12943 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-220431095
**[Test build #58895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58895/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220431087
**[Test build #58893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58893/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220429840
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#issuecomment-220429808
**[Test build #58892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58892/consoleFull)**
for PR 13188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220429839
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220429568
**[Test build #58880 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58880/consoleFull)**
for PR 12979 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63940722
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63940752
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#issuecomment-220424235
**[Test build #58887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58887/consoleFull)**
for PR 12919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220426130
**[Test build #58891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58891/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-220426013
Personally I'm in favor of #2 or #3 since they would both give us nice
looking documentation on par with that of the Scala side.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#issuecomment-220424374
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13089#issuecomment-220425293
@ahnqirage please close this PR. It seems to be opened by mistake.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518#issuecomment-220423703
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13103#issuecomment-220425159
Let's close this PR. This patch isn't opened against the correct branch
anyway.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13123#issuecomment-220424954
@sharkdtu please file a JIRA and add it to the title. Otherwise let's close
this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220424714
By the way, great catch @wangyang1992!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-220424613
LGTM other than the renaming. We shouldn't have
`spark.catalog.refreshTable` and `spark.sessionState.refreshTable` do different
things. I would rename the latter to
401 - 500 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
