Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#issuecomment-220424378
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63937901
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ private[sql] class SessionState(sparkSession:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220423806
**[Test build #58890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58890/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220423786
**[Test build #58889 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58889/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13199#issuecomment-220423799
**[Test build #5 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13199 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13173
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220422012
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183#issuecomment-220423667
Merging into master 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220421720
**[Test build #58873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58873/consoleFull)**
for PR 13163 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-220422809
@davies thank you for your response. Since @rxin categorized this into 2.1,
I understand it should be review for 2.1.
When 2.0 is out, I will ping you for the review.
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13199
[SPARK-15412][PySpark][SparkR][DOCS] Improve linear isotonic regression
pydoc & doc build insturctions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PySpark: Add links to the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220422594
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220422156
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220422121
**[Test build #58885 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58885/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220422151
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220422008
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-220421832
Great! I'm merging this into master 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13173#issuecomment-220421234
Looks good. Merging into master 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#issuecomment-220421374
**[Test build #58887 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58887/consoleFull)**
for PR 12919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220421350
**[Test build #58886 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58886/consoleFull)**
for PR 13177 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#issuecomment-220421059
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13106#issuecomment-220420456
Yup - merged to master/branch-2.0. Thanks for the reminder.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220420285
Jenkins, test it again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220419992
**[Test build #58885 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58885/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13187
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13082#issuecomment-220417162
Merging into master 2.0 thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13187#issuecomment-220419153
Ok, looks good. Merging into master 2.0 thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#issuecomment-220417377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#issuecomment-220417058
**[Test build #58876 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58876/consoleFull)**
for PR 12313 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220414643
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13182
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13175
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220418547
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220418549
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13175#issuecomment-220418403
OK, merging into master 2.0 thanks @sarutak
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220418407
**[Test build #58883 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58883/consoleFull)**
for PR 13164 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13126#issuecomment-220416760
thanks merging into master 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220415062
Yes @zhengruifeng would you mind? It seems that we don't run `lint-java` in
Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220416841
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183#issuecomment-220417868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183#issuecomment-220417866
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13082
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183#issuecomment-220417541
**[Test build #58878 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58878/consoleFull)**
for PR 13183 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#issuecomment-220417372
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13126
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220417362
**[Test build #58884 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58884/consoleFull)**
for PR 12850 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63933593
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13182#issuecomment-220416710
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220416839
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220416508
**[Test build #58874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58874/consoleFull)**
for PR 13087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220416404
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-220416568
@techaddict can you run `dev/lint-java` locally? Jenkins doesn't run that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220416396
**[Test build #58882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58882/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220416403
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63933070
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/JavaPipelineSuite.java ---
@@ -17,47 +17,30 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml;
-import
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63932970
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#discussion_r63932881
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/SharedSparkSession.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198#issuecomment-220416003
**[Test build #58882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58882/consoleFull)**
for PR 13198 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13164#issuecomment-220415965
**[Test build #58883 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58883/consoleFull)**
for PR 13164 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220416079
Rebased to trigger Jenkins test again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13198
[SPARK-15413] [ML] [MLLIB] Change `toBreeze` to `asBreeze` in Vector and
Matrix
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We're using `asML` to convert the mllib vector/matrix to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13128#issuecomment-220414438
uh, I see. Will submit a separate PR to document them, and another one for
issuing exceptions for all the immutable confs.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13106#issuecomment-220414560
Shall we merge then?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13182#issuecomment-220413819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13182#issuecomment-220413814
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13182#issuecomment-220413524
**[Test build #58877 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58877/consoleFull)**
for PR 13182 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220413082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220413078
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850#issuecomment-220412842
**[Test build #58875 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58875/consoleFull)**
for PR 12850 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220412574
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220412550
**[Test build #58881 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58881/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220412578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13128#issuecomment-220411852
All Spark confs are not mutable. For SQL, those metastore related confs are
also not mutable considering the long-running metastore client that we have. I
do think it is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197#issuecomment-220410219
**[Test build #58881 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58881/consoleFull)**
for PR 13197 at commit
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13197
[SPARK-15411] [ML] Add @since to ml.stat.MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add @since to ml.stat.MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13177#discussion_r63928923
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12853#discussion_r63928690
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -616,7 +619,8 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8710#issuecomment-220408309
Yes, unfortunately that is only available in the upcoming 2.0 so you will
have to upgrade to fix the problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13191#issuecomment-220404935
Thanks. Merged into master and 2.0 branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220404758
**[Test build #58880 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58880/consoleFull)**
for PR 12979 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13191
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13196#issuecomment-220401895
**[Test build #58879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58879/consoleFull)**
for PR 13196 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-220400980
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-220400977
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13185#issuecomment-220400568
@zzcclp Just opened #13196 to fix it for branch 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-220400560
**[Test build #58872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58872/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13196
[SPARK-15395][Core]Use getHostString to create RpcAddress (backport for 1.6)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport #13185 to branch 1.6.
## How was this
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10061#discussion_r63921800
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -96,6 +100,7 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8710#issuecomment-220396923
@ljwagerfield it should be fixed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11586
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10061#discussion_r63921076
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -96,6 +100,7 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
Github user ljwagerfield commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8710#issuecomment-220395710
We're seeing this exception too. We're also running our operations in
serial (at least on the surface it seems as if we are). If we execute a
`df.save` operation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13076
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13183#issuecomment-220393553
**[Test build #58878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58878/consoleFull)**
for PR 13183 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#discussion_r63920473
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -706,6 +711,60 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13149
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13076#issuecomment-220394624
LGTM
Merging with master
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220394299
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
501 - 600 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
