Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
Thanks @gatorsmile!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
**[Test build #68185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68185/consoleFull)**
for PR 15432 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -97,17 +101,15 @@ case class Rand(seed:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658562
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -97,17 +101,15 @@ case class Rand(seed:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -97,17 +101,15 @@ case class Rand(seed:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15767
**[Test build #68184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68184/consoleFull)**
for PR 15767 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15767
**[Test build #68182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68182/consoleFull)**
for PR 15767 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
We already have those don't we? sparks own hash expresssion.
On Friday, November 4, 2016, Zhenhua Wang wrote:
> In that way, we can only get the hashed value
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #68179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68179/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68179/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68181/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15766
Only the owner(yourself) can close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
LGTM except a few minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14498#discussion_r86658169
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/test/TestHive.scala ---
@@ -487,24 +487,6 @@ private[hive] class TestHiveQueryExecution(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658154
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -97,17 +101,15 @@ case class Rand(seed:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ case class Rand(seed:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r86658157
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,17 +66,15 @@ abstract class RDG
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #68180 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68180/consoleFull)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68178/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68178/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #68179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68179/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15767#discussion_r86658040
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ private[csv] object
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
@rxin thanks, changed to abstract class. If you think that's sufficient
future proofing I otherwise think this is a worthwhile change, seems like it
meets a real user need.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68173/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693
**[Test build #68173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68173/consoleFull)**
for PR 15693 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
@rxin, I thought reading a small file is a possible corner case. In this
case, it would not be only a small fraction. Improving it without a regression
might be a legitimate optimization by
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68178/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68176/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15766
@cloud-fan I will appreciate that you can help to close this PR~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15766
@rxin @cloud-fan you are rigth,hash should be unregistered and replace
with Hive's hash, or we could put the failed hash testcase into blacklist as
@gatorsmile 's work #14498 . I will close the
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r86657628
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -583,6 +633,50 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746#discussion_r86657586
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1828,13 +1849,13 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"RandomForestRegressionModel"),
#' @note
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68175/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #68175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68175/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68177/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68177/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904
I was testing the fix with different scenarios mentioned in the comments. I
can not make
CSV writer write quoted empty string for empty strings in the data. One
of the issue I filed
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
In that way, we can only get the hashed value instead of real value of the
column, right? So I think we still need to implement a hash code for fractional
types.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68177/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15776
**[Test build #3416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3416/consoleFull)**
for PR 15776 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68170/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Yea good point - the underlying implementation really only needs a hash
code, it would be trivial to support all types. But even easier, I think you
can just compute the hash (using sql expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
**[Test build #68170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68170/consoleFull)**
for PR 15763 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Yes, but in its impl, it actually only supports above types.
```
@Override
public void add(Object item, long count) {
if (item instanceof String) {
addString((String)
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
+1 on removing the use of exceptions. I thought it was a bit of an awkward
solution to begin with. Thanks a lot for this pr, I will take a look soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
It supports arbitrary objects
```
/**
* Increments {@code item}'s count by one.
*/
public abstract void add(Object item);
```
---
If your project is set up for
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
OK, I'll try to use count min sketch. BTW, seems it only supports Integral
and String types for now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #68175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68175/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15766
I am working on the related issue in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14498
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Typo fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15766
@rxin good catch! We do unregister the spark builtin hash in test:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
It supports any data types, uses less space and can provide probabilistic
frequencies for a large number of distinct values, and it's already implemented
in Spark. We just need to add a wrapper for it
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Oh, do you mean using count min sketch for equi-width histogram? Actually I
don't know about the sketch, I need to look into it to see if it's easy to use
as an agg function and also support
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r86656669
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -521,15 +521,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r86656654
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -442,7 +468,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r86656644
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -417,11 +437,17 @@ private[spark] class
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
For equi-height hsitogram, we need extra info like ndv's in each bin. Does
count min sketch also have this information? I had a discussion with Herman and
Tim about histogram construction before, we
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15756
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
**[Test build #68174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68174/consoleFull)**
for PR 15779 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68174/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15756
Cool. Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
@sethah @yanboliang I just saw your PRs for SPARK-17748. Awesome change.
I just saw a few nits along the way.
The only major item is making SingularMatrixException private ml. This
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
**[Test build #68174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68174/consoleFull)**
for PR 15779 at commit
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15779
[SPARK-17748][ML] Minor cleanups to one-pass linear regression with elastic
net
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Made SingularMatrixException private ml
*
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Why not use count min sketch then? You would get more signal (with some
error) for a much larger range of values.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Yes, in our design, equi-width histogram is a seq of single valued bins,
which is used for columns with low cardinality, so that we can get accurate
estimation. When cardinality is high, equi-height
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693
**[Test build #68173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68173/consoleFull)**
for PR 15693 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
@viirya that makes sense to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693#discussion_r86656043
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ReferenceToExpressions.scala
---
@@ -63,15 +63,33 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15769
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15769
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68168/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15769
**[Test build #68168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68168/consoleFull)**
for PR 15769 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68172/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68172/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
How would this pr help you with equi-width histogram? This function just
gives you the frequency count for keys when the cardinality is low.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68171/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68171/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
@ericl Currently I prefer the first one, let `HiveClientImpl` create
multiple internal thrift clients, since I don't like to change external catalog
for this.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68172/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
@rxin Moreover, with this pr we can compute accurate equi-width histogram,
while count min sketch only gets an estimated result? I think it's better to
have an accurate result given that both methods
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68171/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
@rxin About the name "map_aggregate", actually it was suggested by srinath,
do you have a better name?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
@rxin By "histograms" for numeric columns, do you mean equi-height
histogram? The main purpose of this pr is to construct equi-width histogram
without prior knowledge of ndv, so that we can compute
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68169/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15778
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15778
**[Test build #68169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68169/consoleFull)**
for PR 15778 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15771
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 637 matches
Mail list logo