Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
True. That is why I do not know which is the best way for us to show the
argument/parameter names.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
These function docs are printed onto the console.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user aditya1702 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user aditya1702 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
@HyukjinKwon @rxin Yes I think I got confused as pointed out by Hyukjin
above ð
. @HyukjinKwon you can take this one over and cc me. I will work on
another issue. Sorry for the troubles
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Normally, most RDBMS docs are using _Italic fonts_ for the
parameter/argument names. Linux man is using `underscore` to highlight argument
names in descriptions. I also saw another way
```
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
Let us first resolve the paser/syntax-related issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r88794337
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ statement
SET TBLPROPERTIES
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
cc @joshrosen and @zsxwing too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Some of them already had backricks in the description and others did not.
Matching it up with backticks was initially suggested by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68900/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68900/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r88794139
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -694,19 +694,6 @@ class DDLCommandSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
How about the partition columns of partitioned Hive serde tables?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
@HyukjinKwon why did we add backticks to surround all parameters? It looks
pretty weird actually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15937
Thanks I will fix that too.
Merging this in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907
Merging in master/branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907#discussion_r88794022
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSort.java
---
@@ -40,28 +42,28 @@
* of always copying the data
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15943#discussion_r88794018
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -705,12 +701,10 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*
* @param
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r88793956
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15942
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15942
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68899/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15942
**[Test build #68899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68899/consoleFull)**
for PR 15942 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
Ah, @aditya1702, I assume, from the title, you meant to do this for Python
documentation. Actually, the PR you pointed out deals with all of Scala/Java
documentation if I havenât missed some.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15943
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user shiv4nsh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15943
[SPARK-18511] Added an api for join operations just on column name and the
join type
Added an api for join operations just on column name and the join type. An
Api in which we do not have to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68900/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15942
**[Test build #68899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68899/consoleFull)**
for PR 15942 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15942
[SPARK-18407] Inferred partition columns cause assertion error in
StructuredStreaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It turns out we are a bit enthusiastic when
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15893
LGTM. Since this doesn't have impact on performance, and make the codebase
cleaner, I merged this PR into master and branch 2.1. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15652
Aside from me not liking the API change you're introducing, you need to add
a unit test to make sure the feature is working. I suggest taking the scenario
I described in a previous comment
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
Oh, no. It seems still there are a lot of errors. I just meant to show what
I have tried to test with .. :).
Thanks for approving!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15652#discussion_r88790872
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2142,9 +2142,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15941
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15941
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68898/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15941
**[Test build #68898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68898/consoleFull)**
for PR 15941 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
Yes, you should check if they are exposed in the API documentation. I
intentionally updated only those ones before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
LGTM. There are a few style nits that I'll fix during the merge to avoid
another round.
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15941
**[Test build #68898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68898/consoleFull)**
for PR 15941 at commit
GitHub user weiqingy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15941
[SQL][DOC] Fix incorrect `code` tag in docs/sql-programming-guide.md
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix incorrect `code` tag in `sql-programming-guide.md`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68897/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
**[Test build #68897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68897/consoleFull)**
for PR 15848 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
I don't think any of these actually matter, because these functions are not
public documentations.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932#discussion_r88788935
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -648,6 +649,13 @@ class SparkSession private(
}
/**
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932#discussion_r88788917
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -648,6 +649,13 @@ class SparkSession private(
}
/**
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user aditya1702 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
@HyukjinKwon Could you review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user aditya1702 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15940
[SPARK-18447][BUILD][DOCS]Fix `Note:`/`NOTE:`/`Note that` across Pythâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems that just like in Scala/Java there is inconsistency
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
**[Test build #68897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68897/consoleFull)**
for PR 15848 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68896/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
**[Test build #68896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68896/consoleFull)**
for PR 15939 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68895/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
**[Test build #68895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68895/consoleFull)**
for PR 15939 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15861
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15861
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68894/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15861
**[Test build #68894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68894/consoleFull)**
for PR 15861 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
**[Test build #68896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68896/consoleFull)**
for PR 15939 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68893/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68893/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
**[Test build #68895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68895/consoleFull)**
for PR 15939 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15939
[SPARK-3359][BUILD][DOCS] Print examples in javadoc and disable group and
tparam tags in javadoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes/fixes two things.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88783349
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88783252
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88783222
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88783173
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88782911
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88782865
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88782853
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15861
**[Test build #68894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68894/consoleFull)**
for PR 15861 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #68891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68891/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68890/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #68890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68890/consoleFull)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68893/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
Because the comment made by me and +1'ed by marmbrus is hidden at this
point, I just want to re-iterate that this patch should not skip the rest of
the partition in the case that a timeout
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68892/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68892 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68892/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88781534
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ object SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
**[Test build #68892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68892/consoleFull)**
for PR 15913 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Hi, @srowen .
Could you review this PR again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #6 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14627
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68887/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14627
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14627
**[Test build #68887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68887/consoleFull)**
for PR 14627 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68886/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68886/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
@brkyvz
Good question about the shuffling data in the sparse case. Now I give some
simple analysis on it (maybe not very strict):
as discussed above, the shuffling data contains
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #68891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68891/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68885/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
