Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #74383 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74383/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
I added `StackCoercision` at
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251/commits/36d90811a77889b19c47347fc591a8e1a6a482f3),
but reverted that.
For `StackCoercision`, we need
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #74382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74382/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
**[Test build #74375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/testReport)**
for PR 17255 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #74376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251#discussion_r105528166
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -590,6 +591,22 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105528025
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -450,10 +445,22 @@ private[kafka010]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ConeyLiu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
ok, I will close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
**[Test build #74379 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/testReport)**
for PR 17250 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
**[Test build #74380 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/testReport)**
for PR 17209 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
**[Test build #74381 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74381/testReport)**
for PR 17256 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
[SPARK-19919][SQL] Defer throwing the exception for empty paths in CSV
datasource into `DataSource`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to defer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
**[Test build #74380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/testReport)**
for PR 17209 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
@cloud-fan Could you check again? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
**[Test build #74379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/testReport)**
for PR 17250 at commit
Github user shivaram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
**[Test build #74378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74378/testReport)**
for PR 17254 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #74372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
**[Test build #74377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74377/testReport)**
for PR 17254 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
(let me wait for the tests before cc'ing someone)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
**[Test build #74373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/testReport)**
for PR 17254 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #74376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74368/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
**[Test build #74368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74368/testReport)**
for PR 17240 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
**[Test build #74375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/testReport)**
for PR 17255 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
[SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation of JsonFileFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use text datasource when Json schema
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
**[Test build #74367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/testReport)**
for PR 17253 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Basically, we can do that by bringing the logic from
`Stack.checkInputDataTypes`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
@cloud-fan .
For the following case, the values of `stack` consists of multiple columns.
Then, by adding *StackCoercion* rule, we need to *insert Cast() for all
NullType*?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74364/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74364/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
I'm not sure what this refers to. Unless it's giving a clear and
non-trivial improvement to the method signatures, I don't think is worth the
time to discuss and review. This particular change does
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788
@tgravescs , @vanzin - this PR for mesos changes how spark handles kerberos
tokens fundamentally; would be good to have your views.
+CC @jerryshao to also look at the PR, since you have
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319503
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
val locs =
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526180
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
runningStages -=
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526086
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/KerberosUser.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319198
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -151,9 +152,13 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
val
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526225
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -60,9 +60,10 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319759
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/KerberosUtil.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105318927
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -257,10 +257,6 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
just add a new rule like `object IfCoercion extends Rule[LogicalPlan]`, to
handle `Stack` with null literal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105526137
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ case class PartitionedFile(
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055#discussion_r105526116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -2016,48 +2016,79 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105526080
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -130,54 +144,35 @@ class FileScanRDD(
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526016
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -2180,6 +2181,13 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526010
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1357,13 +1360,11 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526000
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1201,7 +1202,9 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
**[Test build #74373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/testReport)**
for PR 17254 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837
hi - where are we on this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
[SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in catalog
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
partition path should be qualified to store in catalog.
There are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74365/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #74365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74365/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
Yes that's the plan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105525303
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ case class PartitionedFile(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
LGTM with very minor comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #74372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105525158
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -130,54 +144,35 @@ class FileScanRDD(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74359/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74359/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74361/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #74361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74361/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
**[Test build #74367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/testReport)**
for PR 17253 at commit
1 - 100 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
