Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Oops, I see, we've cut branch 2.1. I must have missed that one too along
with other dev@ lists going to spam. Yes I will go back and make sure a few
I've just merged to master are in 2.1.
---
If
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
@srowen thanks -- could we also merge this into branch-2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Sounds good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
I guess we could restructure the headings to not have these numbered,
indented sections to begin with, but that's a separate task I think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Good question!
Actually I had tried keeping the indent of the div tags but un-indenting
only the code before I open this pr -- and it looked like this:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
What about keeping the indent of the div tags but un-indenting only the
code? it might look weird in markdown but does it look nice in the rendered
output?
If it's any more trouble than
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
![snip20161101_7](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15843379/19896158/469d72b0-a08e-11e6-972f-5706ab4aa4c4.png)
Please see the screenshot above -- this is `flume doc` -- I got this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67899/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
What about unindenting those blocks? I don't see why they have to be in the
first place. They're HTML tags.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
**[Test build #67899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67899/consoleFull)**
for PR 15715 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
@srowen thanks.
I'm afraid the streaming `flume integration doc`, `kinesis integration
doc`, as well as `kafka08 integration doc` also need code highlights, but this
`{% hightlight %}`
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
That is nicer. Are there any other code snippets across the code base that
need this treatment? seems like this is always the right thing to do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
@koeninger @srowen it'd be great if you could take a look at this too :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
**[Test build #67899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67899/consoleFull)**
for PR 15715 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15715
Fix the leading spaces is needed, because without the fixing the code
snippet would contain leading spaces as well(see the pic below), which is quite
inconsistent with the other programming guides.
19 matches
Mail list logo